From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755551Ab2GEUf7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 16:35:59 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:41870 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175Ab2GEUf5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jul 2012 16:35:57 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6763"; a="205422637" Message-ID: <4FF5FA9B.4070003@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 13:35:39 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ohad Ben-Cohen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Fernando Guzman Lugo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: maintain a generic child device for each rproc References: <1338017791-9442-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <4FC5DBFA.2030300@codeaurora.org> <4FF1F145.2050408@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/02/12 12:54, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Great! It looks like device_type doesn't have any list iteration support >> though. Is that requirement gone? > Pretty much, yeah. I'll soon post a separate patch which removes the > get_by_name functionality (together with its related klist). > >> Will you resend this as part of a series? It will be easier to review then. > Not sure. There's a collection of discrete patches that I've been > posting, but they really aren't an organic series: as long as the > dependencies are met, each and every one of them is applicable even if > applied alone. > > So I'd prefer (when possible) to treat patches in a discrete fashion > so we can start applying them and unblock others who depend on them > (e.g. Fernando's runtime PM work depends on this one). > > But if you prefer me to send this one patch differently to make it > easier to review, let me know! > Ok then. Please add Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd It would be nice if you got an ack from Greg or Kay on the device_type usage too. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.