From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757920Ab2GFRTP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:19:15 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:62269 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757669Ab2GFRTO (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 13:19:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4FF71E0E.8010602@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 11:19:10 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Stephane Eranian , Frederic Weisbecker , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tool: save cmdline from user in file header vs what is passed to record References: <1341547762-17430-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> <20120706171735.GH7533@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20120706171735.GH7533@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/6/12 11:17 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Can you please state for what branch, perf/urgent (i.e. current merge > window) or perf/core (next), this is intended? I usually have been > making the call, but having feedback from the submitter can help things > and help meet expectations more frequently. > > I'd say this one should be for perf/core, as it is not so critical, what > do you think? right, need to add that tag. It's not a regression, just an oversight on the original implementation. perf/core is the right branch. David