From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753580Ab2GINLQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:11:16 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:5993 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753233Ab2GINLP (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:11:15 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="169207702" Message-ID: <4FFAD870.7090209@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 06:11:12 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare CC: Paul Bolle , Randy Dunlap , LKML , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental References: <1341583705.4655.18.camel@amber.site> <4FF71F1C.4040608@xenotime.net> <1341597439.4655.23.camel@amber.site> <4FF72733.8000007@linux.intel.com> <1341605949.22584.6.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <1341820572.4605.35.camel@amber.site> In-Reply-To: <1341820572.4605.35.camel@amber.site> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/9/2012 12:56 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: > Back to my initial question, am I right to assume that > CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR is no longer experimental and can be enabled in > distribution kernels? it HAS been enabled in distribution kernels for YEARS. so yes.