From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755915Ab2GJP2l (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:28:41 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:38889 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753872Ab2GJP2k (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:28:40 -0400 Message-ID: <4FFC4A23.5000107@linaro.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:28:35 +0200 From: Lee Jones User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samuel Ortiz CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, STEricsson_nomadik_linux@list.st.com, linus.walleij@stericsson.com, arnd@arndb.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mfd: ab8500: Clean-up the last two ab8500 related DT match tables References: <1341578598-9307-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120710091304.GU15345@sortiz-mobl> In-Reply-To: <20120710091304.GU15345@sortiz-mobl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/07/12 11:13, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Lee, > > On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 01:43:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> A patch was recently submitted to stop all ab8500 devices from >> being registered through Device Tree. Instead, only the db8500 >> will be DT:ed and the rest will continue to be registered via >> the MFD API, as they always were. >> >> Two patches have recently been applied which enable Device Tree >> probing; one for rtc-ab8500 and the other for ponkey-ab8500. >> These two need to be removed to prevent double-probing these >> devices with Device Tree is enabled. >> >> Cc: Samuel Ortiz >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> --- >> drivers/input/misc/ab8500-ponkey.c | 8 -------- >> drivers/rtc/rtc-ab8500.c | 6 ------ >> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-) > I don't know against which tree you generated those patches, but none of those > 2 of_device_id arrays are in my for-next branch. So I can't apply this patch. I can rebase them on anything of your choosing. What is your for-next branch based on? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog