From: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
To: "Dave, Tushar N" <tushar.n.dave@intel.com>
Cc: "e1000-devel@lists.sf.net" <e1000-devel@lists.sf.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:34:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FFCCA22.8060006@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA891274EE41F@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com>
On 07/11/12 03:02, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of Joe Jin
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 12:40 AM
>> To: Joe Jin
>> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sf.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>>
>> When I debug the driver I found before Detected HW hang, driver unable to
>> clean and reclaim the resources:
>>
>> 1457 while ((eop_desc->upper.data &
>> cpu_to_le32(E1000_TXD_STAT_DD)) && <== at here upper.data always is 0x300
>> 1458 (count < tx_ring->count)) {
>> <--- snip --->
>> 1487 }
>>
>>
>> I checked all driver codes I did not found anywhere will set the
>> upper.data with E1000_TXD_STAT_DD, I guess upper.data be set by hardware?
>
> Yes upper.data (part of it is STATUS byte) is set by HW. Basically driver checks E1000_TXD_STAT_DD (Descriptor Done) bit. If this bit is set that means HW has processed that descriptor and driver can now clean that descriptor.
> With value 0x300 , DD bit is not set. That means HW has not processed that descriptor.
Thanks for the clarify, might be firmware issue?
>
> How fast does tx hang reproduce? I suggest you to enable debug code in driver so when tx hang occurs it will dump the HW desc ring info into kernel log.
Once I copy a file from other server, issue to be reproduced at once.
I'll enable the debug to get more debug info.
> You can run "ethtool -s ethx msglvl 0x2c00" to enable debug.
> Once tx hang occurs please send me the full dmesg log.
>
> Does tx hang occur with in-kernel e1000e driver too?
I tried several drivers included rhel5 the latest, Intel the latest,
rhel6 the latest, issue see on all those drivers.
Thanks,
Joe
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Tushar
>
>
>> If OS is 32bit system, what which happen?
>
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Joe
>>
>> On 07/09/12 16:51, Joe Jin wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a Unit Hang even with the latest e1000e driver 2.0.0 when
>>> doing scp test. this issue is easy do reproduced on SUN FIRE X2270 M2,
>>> just copy a big file (>500M) from another server will hit it at once.
>>>
>>> Would you please help on this?
>>>
>>> device info:
>>> # lspci -s 05:00.0
>>> 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit
>>> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
>>>
>>> # lspci -s 05:00.0 -n
>>> 05:00.0 0200: 8086:10bc (rev 06)
>>>
>>> # ethtool -i eth0
>>> driver: e1000e
>>> version: 2.0.0-NAPI
>>> firmware-version: 5.10-2
>>> bus-info: 0000:05:00.0
>>>
>>> # ethtool -k eth0
>>> Offload parameters for eth0:
>>> rx-checksumming: on
>>> tx-checksumming: on
>>> scatter-gather: on
>>> tcp segmentation offload: on
>>> udp fragmentation offload: off
>>> generic segmentation offload: on
>>> generic-receive-offload: on
>>>
>>> kernel log:
>>> -----------
>>> e1000e 0000:05:00.0: eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
>>> TDH <6c>
>>> TDT <81>
>>> next_to_use <81>
>>> next_to_clean <6b>
>>> buffer_info[next_to_clean]:
>>> time_stamp <fffc7a23>
>>> next_to_watch <71>
>>> jiffies <fffc8c0c>
>>> next_to_watch.status <0>
>>> MAC Status <80387>
>>> PHY Status <792d>
>>> PHY 1000BASE-T Status <3c00>
>>> PHY Extended Status <3000>
>>> PCI Status <10>
>>> e1000e 0000:05:00.0: eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
>>> TDH <6c>
>>> TDT <81>
>>> next_to_use <81>
>>> next_to_clean <6b>
>>> buffer_info[next_to_clean]:
>>> time_stamp <fffc7a23>
>>> next_to_watch <71>
>>> jiffies <fffc9bac>
>>> next_to_watch.status <0>
>>> MAC Status <80387>
>>> PHY Status <792d>
>>> PHY 1000BASE-T Status <3c00>
>>> PHY Extended Status <3000>
>>> PCI Status <10>
>>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:255 dev_watchdog+0x225/0x230()
>>> Hardware name: SUN FIRE X2270 M2 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (e1000e):
>>> transmit queue 0 timed out Modules linked in: autofs4 hidp rfcomm
>>> bluetooth rfkill lockd sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq mperf
>>> be2iscsi iscsi_boot_sysfs ib_iser rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad
>>> ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp bnx2i cnic uio ipv6 cxgb3i libcxgbi cxgb3
>>> mdio libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi video sbs sbshc
>>> acpi_pad acpi_ipmi ipmi_msghandler parport_pc lp parport e1000e(U)
>>> snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_seq_device
>>> igb snd_pcm_oss serio_raw snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm tpm_infineon snd_timer
>>> snd soundcore snd_page_alloc i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt i2c_core pcspkr
>>> i7core_edac iTCO_vendor_support ioatdma ghes dca edac_core hed
>>> dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod usb_storage
>>> sd_mod crc_t10dif sg ahci libahci ext3 jbd mbcache [last unloaded:
>>> microcode]
>>> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-200.24.1.el5uek #1 Call
>>> Trace:
>>> [<c07d9ac5>] ? dev_watchdog+0x225/0x230 [<c045ba61>]
>>> warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xa0 [<c07d9ac5>] ?
>>> dev_watchdog+0x225/0x230 [<c045bb23>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
>>> [<c07d9ac5>] dev_watchdog+0x225/0x230 [<c07d98a0>] ?
>>> dev_activate+0xb0/0xb0 [<c0468e82>] call_timer_fn+0x32/0xf0
>>> [<c04bceb0>] ? rcu_check_callbacks+0x80/0x80 [<c046a76d>]
>>> run_timer_softirq+0xed/0x1b0 [<c07d98a0>] ? dev_activate+0xb0/0xb0
>>> [<c0461a81>] __do_softirq+0x91/0x1a0 [<c04619f0>] ?
>>> local_bh_enable+0x80/0x80 <IRQ> [<c0462295>] ? irq_exit+0x95/0xa0
>>> [<c087f8b8>] ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x38/0x42
>>> [<c08784f5>] ? apic_timer_interrupt+0x31/0x38 [<c046007b>] ?
>>> do_exit+0x11b/0x370 [<c065eae4>] ? intel_idle+0xa4/0x100
>>> [<c078d9b9>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xb9/0x1e0 [<c0411d77>] ?
>>> cpu_idle+0x97/0xd0 [<c085cbbd>] ? rest_init+0x5d/0x70 [<c0b07a7a>] ?
>>> start_kernel+0x28a/0x340 [<c0b074b0>] ? obsolete_checksetup+0xb0/0xb0
>>> [<c0b070a4>] ? i386_start_kernel+0x64/0xb0 ---[ end trace
>>> 5502b55cd4d4e5cb ]--- e1000e 0000:05:00.0: eth0: Reset adapter
>>> e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Joe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-09 8:51 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang Joe Jin
2012-07-09 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 12:19 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-10 7:40 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-10 18:14 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-07-10 19:02 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-10 19:17 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 0:34 ` Joe Jin [this message]
2012-07-11 1:18 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 1:44 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 3:22 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 3:29 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 4:05 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 5:03 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:11 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:17 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:37 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:38 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:50 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:53 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 18:51 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 2:23 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 2:52 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 2:57 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 3:07 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 3:12 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 5:57 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 6:16 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 6:41 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 7:10 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 18:19 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 23:46 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-13 4:10 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-13 4:33 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-15 3:42 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-15 3:52 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-15 13:35 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-16 15:47 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-16 16:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-17 4:48 ` Jon Mason
2012-07-17 4:45 ` Jon Mason
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-08 6:24 Joe Jin
2012-11-08 20:35 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-09 1:22 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 2:47 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 3:45 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-15 0:32 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-15 20:26 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-19 5:38 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-20 8:59 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 3:37 ` Li Yu
2012-11-14 3:43 ` Dave, Tushar N
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FFCCA22.8060006@oracle.com \
--to=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tushar.n.dave@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).