From: Amit <av2082000@gmail.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
shuah@kernel.org
Cc: ricardo@marliere.net, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests: lsm: Refactor `flags_overset_lsm_set_self_attr` test
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 20:55:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a72bea1-da58-438f-b03e-e79bd4011f64@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <196eaffe-c90b-4f44-a748-b786b46fd506@linuxfoundation.org>
On 14/11/24 10:38 pm, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 11/14/24 09:55, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>
>> On 11/14/2024 8:25 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> On 11/12/24 11:28, Amit Vadhavana wrote:
>>>> - Remove unnecessary `tctx` variable, use `ctx` directly.
>>>> - Simplified code with no functional changes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I would rephrase the short to simply say Remove unused variable,
>>> as refactor implies more extensive changes than what this patch
>>> is actually doing.
>>>
>>> Please write complete sentences instead of bullet points in the
>>> change log.
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241116152136.10635-1-av2082000@gmail.com/
>>> >>> How did you find this problem? Do include the details on how
>>> in the change log.
While exploring the kselftest framework. I found the this problem.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Amit Vadhavana <av2082000@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c | 7 +++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c
>>>> b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c
>>>> index 66dec47e3ca3..732e89fe99c0 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lsm/lsm_set_self_attr_test.c
>>>> @@ -56,16 +56,15 @@ TEST(flags_zero_lsm_set_self_attr)
>>>> TEST(flags_overset_lsm_set_self_attr)
>>>> {
>>>> const long page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
>>>> - char *ctx = calloc(page_size, 1);
>>>> + struct lsm_ctx *ctx = calloc(page_size, 1);
>>>
>>> Why not name this tctx and avoid changes to the ASSERT_EQs
>>> below?
>>
>> In the realm of linux security modules ctx is short for "context".
>> I used tctx here because I was lazy. It would be much better to
>> drop tctx, even if it means a tiny bit more change.
>>
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Amit, you can ignore this comment about tctx and ctx. Please do fix
> others about the change log and short log.
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>
--
Thanks,
Amit V.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-16 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 18:28 [PATCH] selftests: lsm: Refactor `flags_overset_lsm_set_self_attr` test Amit Vadhavana
2024-11-12 18:45 ` Casey Schaufler
2024-11-14 16:25 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-14 16:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2024-11-14 17:08 ` Shuah Khan
2024-11-16 15:25 ` Amit [this message]
2024-11-27 3:38 ` Paul Moore
2024-12-04 0:00 ` Shuah Khan
2024-12-04 3:45 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a72bea1-da58-438f-b03e-e79bd4011f64@gmail.com \
--to=av2082000@gmail.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=ricardo@marliere.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox