Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: User mutex guards to eliminate __kvm_x86_vendor_init()

["Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 18:17 +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> 
> On 30.10.23 г. 18:07 ч., Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > > Current separation between (__){0,1}kvm_x86_vendor_init() is superfluos as
> > 
> > superfluous
> > 
> > But this intro is actively misleading.  The double-underscore variant most definitely
> > isn't superfluous, e.g. it eliminates the need for gotos reduces the probability
> > of incorrect error codes, bugs in the error handling, etc.  It _becomes_ superflous
> > after switching to guard(mutex).
> > 
> > IMO, this is one of the instances where the "problem, then solution" appoach is
> > counter-productive.  If there are no objections, I'll massage the change log to
> > the below when applying (for 6.8, in a few weeks).
> > 
> >    Use the recently introduced guard(mutex) infrastructure acquire and
> >    automatically release vendor_module_lock when the guard goes out of scope.
> >    Drop the inner __kvm_x86_vendor_init(), its sole purpose was to simplify
> >    releasing vendor_module_lock in error paths.
> > 
> >    No functional change intended.
> 
> Thanks, I'm fine with this changelog.
> 
> 

Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>