From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262528AbVFJJHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:07:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262530AbVFJJHu (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:07:50 -0400 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.198]:16925 "EHLO nproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262528AbVFJJHc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:07:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uuNeNDCNVoIF3cqFDcmwtR3WrVE9PAXVhlWJmrj0X0TFsty1d7cLA6wSx6QVzh6/n9LviSKx8FzPd2UzHByQmRGQG9wRhu5rd+EYIwtEmhIJTcnYbSHpnNsoDln1qq1ggrAEMVX5iONa3gGpkurdl8K3CKw35HZvFxUqqA9JSvg= Message-ID: <4ad99e050506100207224a263f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:07:31 +0200 From: Lars Roland Reply-To: Lars Roland To: Sonny Rao Subject: Re: Fusion MPT driver version 3.01.20 VS. version 2.03.00 Cc: Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: <20050609145709.GA23865@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <4ad99e050506071428278c3018@mail.gmail.com> <20050607224033.GA14108@localhost.localdomain> <4ad99e05050609012630a2ad3@mail.gmail.com> <20050609145709.GA23865@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6/9/05, Sonny Rao wrote: > Yeah, the only other thing I noticed is that your IRQ number is really > large compared to mine, I'm not sure if that's some artifact of ACPI > or what is going on there. Have you tried turning off ACPI or > pci=routeirq and the like? Nope but I will look at it. > > My /proc/interrupts looks like this: > > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 > 0: 80270452 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge > timer > 1: 31529 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > 5: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi > 8: 1 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc > 11: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd > 12: 503960 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 > 15: 721836 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1 > 22: 152445 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level ioc0 > 25: 922998 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth1 > NMI: 0 0 0 0 > LOC: 80274015 80273964 80274024 80274023 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > Is yours similar? My looks like this on kernel 2.6: --------------------- CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 13089 0 251098584 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 8 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 5: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 8: 73 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 11: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd:usb1 12: 110 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 15: 12 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1 169: 24892566 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level ioc0 177: 121556391 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 NMI: 0 0 0 0 LOC: 251145010 251145083 251145081 251145081 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 --------------------- using kernel 2.4 it looks like this --------------------- CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 128904101 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 2 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 358 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 11: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level usb-ohci 15: 2 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ide1 22: 68048860 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level ioc0 24: 610278021 0 0 0 IO-APIC-level eth0 NMI: 0 0 0 0 LOC: 128905644 128905629 128905632 128905638 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 --------------------- I think you have good points about the irq beeing high. Regards. Lars Roland