From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933302AbcINUwJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:52:09 -0400 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:41224 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756189AbcINUwF (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:52:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: calc mult and shift from refclk freq To: Richard Cochran References: <20160914130231.3035-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20160914130231.3035-8-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <20160914202618.GC12195@netboy> CC: "David S. Miller" , , Mugunthan V N , Sekhar Nori , , , WingMan Kwok , John Stultz From: Grygorii Strashko Message-ID: <4add2983-bdfe-8436-de62-4b2fdc2ea750@ti.com> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 23:47:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160914202618.GC12195@netboy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/14/2016 11:26 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:29PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> +static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts) >> +{ >> + u64 maxsec; >> + u32 freq; >> + u32 mult; >> + u32 shift; >> + u64 ns; >> + u64 frac; >> + >> + if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift) >> + return; >> + >> + freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk); >> + >> + /* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before >> + * wrapping around. >> + */ >> + maxsec = cpts->cc.mask; >> + do_div(maxsec, freq); >> + if (!maxsec) >> + maxsec = 1; > > This doesn't pass the smell test. If the max counter value is M, you > are figuring M*1/F which is the time in seconds corresponding to M. > We set M=2^32-1, and so 'freq' would have to be greater than 4 GHz in > order for 'maxsec' to be zero. Do you really expect such high > frequency input clocks? no. can drop it. > >> + else if (maxsec > 600 && cpts->cc.mask > UINT_MAX) >> + maxsec = 600; > > What is this all about? cc.mask is always 2^32 - 1. Oh. Not sure if we will update CPTS to support this, but on KS2 E/L (66AK2E) CPTS counter can work in 64bit mode. > >> + clocks_calc_mult_shift(&mult, &shift, freq, NSEC_PER_SEC, maxsec); >> + >> + cpts->cc_mult = mult; >> + cpts->cc.mult = mult; > > In order to get good resolution on the frequency adjustment, we want > to keep 'mult' as large as possible. I don't see your code doing > this. We can rely on the watchdog reader (work queue) to prevent > overflows. As I understand (and tested), clocks_calc_mult_shift() will return max possible mult which can be used without overflow. if calculated results do not satisfy end user - the custom values can be passed in DT. -- regards, -grygorii