From: Xin Zhao <uszhaoxin@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NFS2 question, help, pls!
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:22:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ae3c1405041212223ee0609e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
I have very very fast network and is testing NFS2 over this kind of
network. I noticed that for standard work like read/write a large
file, compile kernels, the performance of NFS2 is good. But if I try
to decompress kernel tar file. The standard ext2 takes 28s while NFS2
takes 81s. Also, if I remove the kernel source code tree, ext2 takes
19s but NFS2 takes 44s.
Why? (You can assume that network is very fast. ) Is there any
improvements in NFS3/4 on this issue? If so, how?
Many thanks in advance for your kind help!
xin
next reply other threads:[~2005-04-12 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-12 19:22 Xin Zhao [this message]
2005-04-12 22:26 ` NFS2 question, help, pls! Trond Myklebust
2005-04-12 23:10 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ae3c1405041212223ee0609e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=uszhaoxin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox