From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Pavel Machek' <pavel@ucw.cz>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] string: Allow 2-argument strscpy()
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:51:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b396628800149c69e157f0340778fbf@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZcPDMZFPY08S4MGR@duo.ucw.cz>
From: Pavel Machek
> Sent: 07 February 2024 17:52
> > > Using sizeof(dst) is the overwhelmingly common case for strscpy().
> > > Instead of requiring this everywhere, allow a 2-argument version to be
> > > used that will use the sizeof() internally.
> >
> > Yeah, this is definitely the case. I have a ton of patches replacing
> > strncpy with strscpy [1] and many of them match the pattern of:
> > | strscpy(dest, src, sizeof(dest))
> >
> > BTW, this hack for function overloading is insane. Never really looked into
> > it before.
>
> This hack is insane, but this is also highly confusing, please don't
> do this.
A much simpler 'hack' - here defaulting in 16.
Although you'd probably want a compile-time check on the
number of arguments.
And convert 'sizeof 'non-array' to (say) -1 and error
a length that is a constant -1.
David
extern int func_2(void *, const void *, int);
#define func_1(_p0, _p1, len, ...) func_2(_p0, _p1, len)
#define func(_p0, ...) func_1(_p0, __VA_ARGS__, 16)
int f1(void *p0, const void *p1)
{
return func(p0, p1);
}
int f2(void *p0, const void *p1, int len)
{
return func(p0, p1, len);
}
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-10 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 20:29 [RFC] string: Allow 2-argument strscpy() Kees Cook
2024-01-29 21:55 ` Justin Stitt
2024-01-29 22:02 ` Kees Cook
2024-01-29 23:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-01-29 23:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-02-07 17:51 ` Pavel Machek
2024-02-10 13:02 ` David Laight
2024-02-10 13:51 ` David Laight [this message]
2024-02-01 22:29 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b396628800149c69e157f0340778fbf@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox