Re: [patch V2 0/3] ptp: Provide support for auxiliary clocks for PTP_SYS_OFFSET_EXTENDED

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On 7/3/25 2:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03 2025 at 12:27, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On 7/1/25 3:26 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Merge logistics if agreed on:
>>>
>>>     1) Patch #1 is applied to the tip tree on top of plain v6.16-rc1 and
>>>        tagged
>>>
>>>     2) That tag is merged into tip:timers/ptp and the temporary CLOCK_AUX
>>>        define is removed in a subsequent commit
>>>
>>>     3) Network folks merge the tag and apply patches #2 + #3
>>>
>>> So the only fallout from this are the extra merges in both trees and the
>>> cleanup commit in the tip tree. But that way there are no dependencies and
>>> no duplicate commits with different SHAs.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> I'm sorry for the latency here; the plan works for me! I'll wait for the
>> tag reference.
> 
> No problem. Rome wasn't built in a day either :)
> 
>> Could you please drop a notice here when such tag will be available?
> 
> Here you go:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git ktime-get-clock-ts64-for-ptp
> 
> I merged it locally into net-next, applied the PTP patches on top and
> verified that the combination with the tip timers/ptp branch, which has
> the tag integrated and the workaround removed, creates the expected
> working result.

I had to wrestle a bit with the script I use - since the whole thing was
a little different from my usual workflow - but it's in now, hoping I
did not mess badly with something.

/P