Re: User space out of memory approach

Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-10T23:38:42Z

actually 'than' is much better then :-)

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 01:17:01 +0200, Edjard Souza Mota <edjard@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Sorry, I misunderstood. Should have read the code before shouting.
>
> Better shouting then shooting :)!
>
> br
>
> Edjard
>
>
> >
> > The feature is interesting - several similar patches have been around with similar
> > functionality (people who need usually write their own, I've seen a few), but none
> > has ever been merged, even though it is an important requirement for many users.
> >
> > This is simple, an ordered list of candidate PIDs. IMO something similar to this
> > should be merged. Andrew ?
> >
> > Few comments about the code:
> >
> > retry:
> > - p = select_bad_process();
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "A good walker leaves no tracks.\n");
> > + p = select_process();
> >
> > You want to fallback to select_bad_process() if no candidate has been selected at
> > select_process().
> >
> > You also want to move "oom" to /proc/sys/vm/.
> >
> >
>
> --
> "In a world without fences ... who needs Gates?"
>

--
"In a world without fences ... who needs Gates?"