From: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Trying out SCHED_BATCH
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:36:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d8e3fd304122923362d823e34@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041229232028.055f8786.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:20:28 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
> Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew,
> > what's your plan for the staircase scheduler ?
>
> I have none, frankly. I haven't seen any complaints about the current
> scheduler.
>
> If someone can identify bad behaviour in the current scheduler which
> staircase improves then please describe a tescase which the scheduler
> developers can use to reproduce the situation.
>
> If, after that, we deem that the problem cannot be feasibly fixed within the
> context of the current scheduler and that the problem is sufficiently
> serious to justify wholesale replacement of the scheduler then sure,
> staircase is an option.
Your answer makes lot of sense.
I think Con can explain the pro and cons of the staircase scheduler.
Best,
--
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-30 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-25 11:31 Trying out SCHED_BATCH Rajsekar
2004-12-25 11:41 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 20:14 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2004-12-29 20:28 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-29 22:46 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-29 22:56 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-30 7:12 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2004-12-30 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-30 7:36 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2004-12-30 7:41 ` Con Kolivas
2004-12-30 16:16 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-01-02 0:26 ` Peter Williams
2004-12-25 11:46 ` Matan Peled
2004-12-25 18:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-25 23:09 ` Con Kolivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d8e3fd304122923362d823e34@mail.gmail.com \
--to=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=solt2@dns.toxicfilms.tv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox