From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
Cc: irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com, srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com,
xi.pardee@linux.intel.com, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 14/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry: Fix cleanup pattern for __free() variables
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 16:33:06 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e5324cb-a60d-c292-8945-583723f18571@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260325014819.1283566-15-david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, 24 Mar 2026, David E. Box wrote:
> Fix improper cleanup.h usage where __free() variables were initialized to
> NULL and then assigned later. Move ssram variable declarations into the
> if/else branches where they're actually assigned to follow the safer
> pattern recommended in cleanup.h. This change requires also moving the
> pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase() and add_pmt calls into both if/else branches
> to keep operations within the scope of the local ssram variables.
>
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> V2 changes:
> - New patch addressing Ilpo's review of cleanup.h patterns
>
> .../platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c | 25 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> index b329e0c0080b..b1ba17f18ea5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry.c
> @@ -102,12 +102,11 @@ pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(struct pci_dev *pcidev, u64 ssram_base, void __iomem
> static int
> pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_pci(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int pmc_idx, u32 offset)
> {
> - void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *tmp_ssram = NULL;
> - void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *ssram = NULL;
> u64 ssram_base;
>
> ssram_base = pci_resource_start(pcidev, 0);
> - tmp_ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
> + void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *tmp_ssram =
> + ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
> if (!tmp_ssram)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -121,18 +120,24 @@ pmc_ssram_telemetry_get_pmc_pci(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int pmc_idx, u3
> if (!ssram_base)
> return 0;
>
> - ssram = ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
> + void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *ssram =
> + ioremap(ssram_base, SSRAM_HDR_SIZE);
> if (!ssram)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(ssram, pmc_idx);
> +
> + /* Find and register and PMC telemetry entries */
> + return pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(pcidev, ssram_base, ssram);
> } else {
> - ssram = no_free_ptr(tmp_ssram);
> + void __iomem __free(pmc_ssram_telemetry_iounmap) *ssram =
> + no_free_ptr(tmp_ssram);
> +
> + pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(ssram, pmc_idx);
> +
> + /* Find and register and PMC telemetry entries */
> + return pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(pcidev, ssram_base, ssram);
> }
> -
> - pmc_ssram_get_devid_pwrmbase(ssram, pmc_idx);
> -
> - /* Find and register and PMC telemetry entries */
> - return pmc_ssram_telemetry_add_pmt(pcidev, ssram_base, ssram);
Hi,
I'm sorry you probably made this because of my request, but this doesn't
make things simpler so lets stick with having that = NULL outside of the
inner blocks.
You could have overruled me at your own discretion when you realized you
have to start duplicating code (and just mention that in the coverletter).
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-25 1:48 [PATCH V2 00/17] Add ACPI-based PMT discovery support for Intel PMC David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 01/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Add pre/post decode hooks around header parsing David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 02/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog: Split init into pre-decode David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 03/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry: Move overlap check to post-decode hook David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 04/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Move header decode into common helper David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:05 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 05/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Pass discovery index instead of resource David E. Box
2026-04-07 11:07 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 06/17] platform/x86/intel/pmt: Unify header fetch and add ACPI source David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 07/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add PMC SSRAM Kconfig description David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:16 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 08/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add ACPI PWRM telemetry driver for Nova Lake S David E. Box
2026-04-07 12:56 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 09/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Rename probe and PCI ID table for consistency David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 10/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Use fixed-size static pmc array David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:08 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 11/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor DEVID/PWRMBASE extraction into helper David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 12/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add PCI platform data David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 13/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Refactor memory barrier for reentrant probe David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 14/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram_telemetry: Fix cleanup pattern for __free() variables David E. Box
2026-04-07 13:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 15/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Add ACPI discovery scaffolding David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 16/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc/ssram: Make PMT registration optional David E. Box
2026-03-25 1:48 ` [PATCH V2 17/17] platform/x86/intel/pmc: Add NVL PCI IDs for SSRAM telemetry discovery David E. Box
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e5324cb-a60d-c292-8945-583723f18571@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=irenic.rajneesh@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xi.pardee@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox