public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: fio rand read/write regression with 2.6.32-rc3
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:23:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e5e476b0910110123s54debc6as435c9cc0d5e8340c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255168333.25078.82.camel@ymzhang>

On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
<yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-10 at 10:01 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 10 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
>> > Comparing with 2.6.23-rc1's result, fio rand read write has regression
>> > on my 2*4 core stoakley machine (8GB memory) with a JBOD of 12 disks.
>> >
>> > Every disk has 8 1-GB files. Start 8 sub-processes per disk and every
>> > process random chooses a file on the disk to do 36 times of file read or
>> > write on the file and then choose another file.
>> >
>> >
>> > fio_mmap_rand_read_4k regresion is about 35%.
>>
>> Heh, I seem to recollect I told Linus that this would cost is 30-40%
>> performance. So not totally crazy.
>>
>> So yes, this isn't hugely unexpected. If you send me your fio job files,
>> I'll try and see what I can do about it.
> See the attachment.
>
Hi Yanmin,
the fio test you sent just performs random read, no write seems involved here.
I suspect that you should be able to observe the same regression if
you just run on a single disk. Can you confirm?
Is your disk a SATA2 rotational disk with NCQ?

Thanks,
Corrado

-- 
__________________________________________________________________________

dott. Corrado Zoccolo                          mailto:czoccolo@gmail.com
PhD - Department of Computer Science - University of Pisa, Italy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-11  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-10  5:48 fio rand read/write regression with 2.6.32-rc3 Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-10  8:01 ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-10  8:02   ` Jens Axboe
2009-10-10  9:47     ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-10  9:52   ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-10-11  8:23     ` Corrado Zoccolo [this message]
2009-10-12  5:50       ` Zhang, Yanmin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4e5e476b0910110123s54debc6as435c9cc0d5e8340c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox