From: "zhangwensheng (E)" <zhangwensheng5@huawei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: <rafael@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<yukuai3@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] driver core: fix deadlock in __driver_attach
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:00:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e5e9276-e32d-0903-1f4e-20880cc72d82@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YqNL6NPgP+cLOy/I@kroah.com>
sorry that I didn't see your reply.
it is real not potential, I have triggered this problem successfully and
proven that this change can fix it.
stack like commit b232b02bf3c2 ("driver core: fix deadlock in
__device_attach").
list below:
In __driver_attach function, The lock holding logic is as follows:
...
__driver_attach
if (driver_allows_async_probing(drv))
device_lock(dev) // get lock dev
async_schedule_dev(__driver_attach_async_helper, dev); // func
async_schedule_node
async_schedule_node_domain(func)
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct async_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
/* when fail or work limit, sync to execute func, but
__driver_attach_async_helper will get lock dev as
will, which will lead to A-A deadlock. */
if (!entry || atomic_read(&entry_count) > MAX_WORK) {
func;
else
queue_work_node(node, system_unbound_wq, &entry->work)
device_unlock(dev)
As above show, when it is allowed to do async probes, because of
out of memory or work limit, async work is not be allowed, to do
sync execute instead. it will lead to A-A deadlock because of
__driver_attach_async_helper getting lock dev.
Because it's logic is same as commit b232b02bf3c2 ("driver core:
fix deadlock
in __device_attach"), I simplify the description.
Reproduce:
and it can be reproduce by make the condition
(if (!entry || atomic_read(&entry_count) > MAX_WORK)) untenable, like below:
[ 370.785650] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[ 370.787154] task:swapper/0 state:D stack: 0 pid: 1
ppid: 0 flags:0x00004000
[ 370.788865] Call Trace:
[ 370.789374] <TASK>
[ 370.789841] __schedule+0x482/0x1050
[ 370.790613] schedule+0x92/0x1a0
[ 370.791290] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x2c/0x50
[ 370.792256] __mutex_lock.isra.0+0x757/0xec0
[ 370.793158] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x1f/0x30
[ 370.794079] mutex_lock+0x50/0x60
[ 370.794795] __device_driver_lock+0x2f/0x70
[ 370.795677] ? driver_probe_device+0xd0/0xd0
[ 370.796576] __driver_attach_async_helper+0x1d/0xd0
[ 370.797318] ? driver_probe_device+0xd0/0xd0
[ 370.797957] async_schedule_node_domain+0xa5/0xc0
[ 370.798652] async_schedule_node+0x19/0x30
[ 370.799243] __driver_attach+0x246/0x290
[ 370.799828] ? driver_allows_async_probing+0xa0/0xa0
[ 370.800548] bus_for_each_dev+0x9d/0x130
[ 370.801132] driver_attach+0x22/0x30
[ 370.801666] bus_add_driver+0x290/0x340
[ 370.802246] driver_register+0x88/0x140
[ 370.802817] ? virtio_scsi_init+0x116/0x116
[ 370.803425] scsi_register_driver+0x1a/0x30
[ 370.804057] init_sd+0x184/0x226
[ 370.804533] do_one_initcall+0x71/0x3a0
[ 370.805107] kernel_init_freeable+0x39a/0x43a
[ 370.805759] ? rest_init+0x150/0x150
[ 370.806283] kernel_init+0x26/0x230
[ 370.806799] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
And my change can fix it.
thanks.
Wensheng.
在 2022/6/10 21:49, Greg KH 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 05:43:55PM +0800, Zhang Wensheng wrote:
>> In __driver_attach function, There are also potential AA deadlock
>> problem, like the commit b232b02bf3c2 ("driver core: fix deadlock
>> in __device_attach").
> Potential, but real?
>
> And the codepaths for drivers being added is much different than
> devices, please provide the full information like you did in the other
> commit.
>
> Also, have you triggered this problem successfully and proven that this
> change fixes the issue?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
> .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-16 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-08 9:43 [PATCH -next] driver core: fix deadlock in __driver_attach Zhang Wensheng
2022-06-10 13:49 ` Greg KH
2022-06-16 8:00 ` zhangwensheng (E) [this message]
2022-06-21 19:34 ` Greg KH
2022-06-16 7:11 ` zhangwensheng (E)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e5e9276-e32d-0903-1f4e-20880cc72d82@huawei.com \
--to=zhangwensheng5@huawei.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox