From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A202C001B2 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231495AbiLVQRd (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:17:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229764AbiLVQRa (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2022 11:17:30 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF10220C6; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C895AB803F2; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26B5BC433EF; Thu, 22 Dec 2022 16:17:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1671725847; bh=Dg4BfgoD9YyHNiJlbfaKe3wduOjMhakUuIqaDZWVMts=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=r6iKDDAJAHG+tS7DCBhoWziRGZ0VtwQfnefbMTUuPF7/ibqRSOCtx1EF1UK+X+9U/ /k+smgNITqozFDcN3VQBWmPmYBbwMyYH2FR7yBWIIfgvsf9WTtMANljAh3mITMtsDM 9okAQrVDObXXuv3RnHWjt3W/sYMUVgSjdFaWO0qgLyP1DNDEMoQNA1HGGcNjfsNYjl HQz5bANbmLgCg4xofTFJyPCVh9x8DU0RHm3HV++HGeD99FPZDj9Nfjvg+B+4az3d4Z t12BI4bPjjXIlA3M0fgFWptMgDNXESRPYlizuE5HRA729tAv6TIj1fRfZMqKuKYj4g OLniTpyqA30wQ== Message-ID: <4f52f323-c8eb-bab0-ffa8-2c53c20d35ec@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 09:17:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Subject: Re: [net-next] ipv6: fix routing cache overflow for raw sockets To: Jonathan Maxwell Cc: Paolo Abeni , davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20221218234801.579114-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com> <9f145202ca6a59b48d4430ed26a7ab0fe4c5dfaf.camel@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: David Ahern In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/21/22 10:39 PM, Jonathan Maxwell wrote: > There are some mistakes in this prototype patch. Let me come up with a > better one. I'll submit a new patch in the new year for review. Thanks for > the suggestion DavidA. you are welcome. When you submit the next one, it would be helpful to show change in memory consumption and a comparison to IPv4 for a similar raw socket program.