From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S932467AbVHSK2r@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932467AbVHSK2r (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:28:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932614AbVHSK2r
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:28:47 -0400
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197]:22623 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932467AbVHSK2q convert rfc822-to-8bit
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 19 Aug 2005 06:28:46 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=JUpwiWWNs2MZl//umadjjKct7bi+VmNQumW7r7AxaIqpPu4gDc9gkVy1fI1QdanqujZol9u53Ow6CReHNbLmvw0IiO2DMT8JAJyXx0mL0nbYWf9YGlK2+Pd2hz4CarN1iq+oDjwS7G/tuakdTdVuq3FBuNSnruxhKwrYUodo0AM=
Message-ID: <4fec73ca0508190328f8b9df9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:28:43 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Guillermo_L=F3pez_Alejos?= <glalejos@gmail.com>
To: "Peter M. Groen" <pgroen@osdev.xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Environment variables inside the kernel?
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <200508190055.16515.pgroen@osdev.xs4all.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4fec73ca050818084467f04c31@mail.gmail.com>
	 <wn5slx75cjs.fsf@linhd-2.ca.nortel.com>
	 <1124406748.20755.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <200508190055.16515.pgroen@osdev.xs4all.nl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Friday 19 August 2005 01:12, Alan Cox wrote:
> ---------------[ 8< ]-------------
> > Essentially environment is user space business and you can't get at it
> > from the kernel.
> -[ 8< ]------------
> 
> I think the OP has his answer here. If someone knows what he is talking about,
> it's Alan or Linus. And if a teacher or manager doesn't believe those two...
> Let *him* prove that AC and LT are wrong, and not the other way around..

This definition given by Alan Cox is enough for me, and I think that
it will be enough for my tutor too.

Thanks again,

-- 
Guillermo