Re: [PATCH v1 02/12] fpga: create intel max10 bmc security engine

Russ Weight
2020-09-30T23:15:25Z

Hi Moritz,

On 9/16/20 1:33 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Russ,
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 04:52:55PM -0700, Russ Weight wrote:
>> Create a platform driver that can be invoked as a sub
>> driver for the Intel MAX10 BMC in order to support
>> secure updates. This sub-driver will invoke an
>> instance of the Intel FPGA Security Manager class driver
>> in order to expose sysfs interfaces for managing and
>> monitoring secure updates to FPGA and BMC images.
>>
>> This patch creates the MAX10 BMC Security Engine driver and
>> provides support for displaying the current root entry hashes
>> for the FPGA static region, the FPGA PR region, and the MAX10
>> BMC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 11 ++
>> drivers/fpga/Makefile | 3 +
>> drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h | 15 +++
>> 4 files changed, 199 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> index 97c0a6cc2ba7..0f0bed68e618 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
>> @@ -244,4 +244,15 @@ config IFPGA_SEC_MGR
>> region and for the BMC. Select this option to enable
>> updates for secure FPGA devices.
>>
>> +config IFPGA_M10_BMC_SECURE
>> + tristate "Intel MAX10 BMC security engine"
>> + depends on MFD_INTEL_M10_BMC && IFPGA_SEC_MGR
>> + help
>> + Secure update support for the Intel MAX10 board management
>> + controller.
>> +
>> + This is a subdriver of the Intel MAX10 board management controller
>> + (BMC) and provides support for secure updates for the BMC image,
>> + the FPGA image, the Root Entry Hashes, etc.
>> +
>> endif # FPGA
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> index ec9fbacdedd8..451a23ec3168 100644
>> --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
>> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_PR_IP_CORE_PLAT) += altera-pr-ip-core-plat.o
>> # Intel FPGA Security Manager Framework
>> obj-$(CONFIG_IFPGA_SEC_MGR) += ifpga-sec-mgr.o
>>
>> +# Intel Security Manager Drivers
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_IFPGA_M10_BMC_SECURE) += intel-m10-bmc-secure.o
>> +
>> # FPGA Bridge Drivers
>> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_BRIDGE) += fpga-bridge.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_SOCFPGA_FPGA_BRIDGE) += altera-hps2fpga.o altera-fpga2sdram.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1f86bfb694b4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel-m10-bmc-secure.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Intel Max10 Board Management Controller Security Engine Driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019-2020 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/fpga/ifpga-sec-mgr.h>
>> +#include <linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>> +
>> +struct m10bmc_sec {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct intel_m10bmc *m10bmc;
>> + struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define SHA256_REH_SIZE 32
>> +#define SHA384_REH_SIZE 48
>> +
>> +static int get_reh_size(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr,
>> + u32 exp_magic, u32 prog_addr)
>> +{
>> + struct m10bmc_sec *sec = imgr->priv;
>> + int sha_num_bytes, ret;
>> + u32 magic;
>> +
>> + ret = m10bmc_raw_read(sec->m10bmc, prog_addr, &magic);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(sec->dev, "%s magic 0x%08x\n", __func__, magic);
>> +
>> + if ((magic & 0xffff) != exp_magic)
> Consider using GENMASK() here.
Yes - will do.
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + sha_num_bytes = ((magic >> 16) & 0xffff) / 8;
> And here.
Yes
>> +
>> + if (sha_num_bytes != SHA256_REH_SIZE &&
>> + sha_num_bytes != SHA384_REH_SIZE) {
>> + dev_err(sec->dev, "%s bad sha num bytes %d\n", __func__,
>> + sha_num_bytes);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return sha_num_bytes;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define BMC_REH_ADDR 0x17ffc004
>> +#define BMC_PROG_ADDR 0x17ffc000
>> +#define BMC_PROG_MAGIC 0x5746
>> +
>> +#define SR_REH_ADDR 0x17ffd004
>> +#define SR_PROG_ADDR 0x17ffd000
>> +#define SR_PROG_MAGIC 0x5253
>> +
>> +#define PR_REH_ADDR 0x17ffe004
>> +#define PR_PROG_ADDR 0x17ffe000
>> +#define PR_PROG_MAGIC 0x5250
>> +
>> +#define SYSFS_GET_REH_SIZE(_name, _exp_magic, _prog_addr) \
>> +static int get_##_name##_reh_size(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr) \
>> +{ \
>> + return get_reh_size(imgr, _exp_magic, _prog_addr); \
>> +}
>> +
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH_SIZE(bmc, BMC_PROG_MAGIC, BMC_PROG_ADDR)
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH_SIZE(sr, SR_PROG_MAGIC, SR_PROG_ADDR)
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH_SIZE(pr, PR_PROG_MAGIC, PR_PROG_ADDR)
>> +
>> +static int get_root_entry_hash(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr,
>> + u32 hash_addr, u8 *hash,
>> + unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> + struct m10bmc_sec *sec = imgr->priv;
>> + unsigned int stride = regmap_get_reg_stride(sec->m10bmc->regmap);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = m10bmc_raw_bulk_read(sec->m10bmc, hash_addr,
>> + hash, size / stride);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(sec->dev, "bulk_read of 0x%x failed %d",
>> + hash_addr, ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define SYSFS_GET_REH(_name, _hash_addr) \
>> +static int get_##_name##_root_entry_hash(struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr, \
>> + u8 *hash, unsigned int size) \
>> +{ \
>> + return get_root_entry_hash(imgr, _hash_addr, hash, size); \
>> +}
>> +
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH(bmc, BMC_REH_ADDR)
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH(sr, SR_REH_ADDR)
>> +SYSFS_GET_REH(pr, PR_REH_ADDR)
> Tbh, I'd drop the macro and just have the functions as one liners,
> and yes, please add the prefix.
OK - I'll drop the macros and add the prefixes.

>> +
>> +static const struct ifpga_sec_mgr_ops m10bmc_iops = {
>> + .bmc_root_entry_hash = get_bmc_root_entry_hash,
>> + .sr_root_entry_hash = get_sr_root_entry_hash,
>> + .pr_root_entry_hash = get_pr_root_entry_hash,
>> + .bmc_reh_size = get_bmc_reh_size,
>> + .sr_reh_size = get_sr_reh_size,
>> + .pr_reh_size = get_pr_reh_size,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void ifpga_sec_mgr_uinit(struct m10bmc_sec *sec)
>> +{
>> + ifpga_sec_mgr_unregister(sec->imgr);
>> +}
> Consider dropping this function (see below).
Sure - I can drop the init and uinit functions.
>> +
>> +static int ifpga_sec_mgr_init(struct m10bmc_sec *sec)
>> +{
>> + struct ifpga_sec_mgr *imgr;
>> +
>> + imgr = ifpga_sec_mgr_register(sec->dev, "Max10 BMC Security Manager",
>> + &m10bmc_iops, sec);
>> + if (IS_ERR(imgr))
>> + return PTR_ERR(imgr);
>> +
>> + sec->imgr = imgr;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int m10bmc_secure_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct m10bmc_sec *sec;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + sec = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sec), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!sec)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + sec->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + sec->m10bmc = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, sec);
> If you implement the devm_ versions then this could be:
>
> imgr = devm_ifpga_sec_mgr_create(&pdev->dev, "Max10 BMC Security
> Manager", &m10bmc_ips, sec);
> if (IS_ERR(imgr))
> return PTR_ERR(imgr);
> sec->imgr = imgr;
>
> return ifpga_sec_mgr_register(imgr);
If ifpga_sec_mgr_register fails, I think it would be necessary to call
"put_device(&imgr->dev)" here to release the device created by
devm_ifpga_sec_mgr_create()?

Thanks,
- Russ
>
>> +
>> + ret = ifpga_sec_mgr_init(sec);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>> + "Security manager failed to start: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int m10bmc_secure_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct m10bmc_sec *sec = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + ifpga_sec_mgr_uinit(sec);
> If you drop the above:
> ifpga_sec_mgr_remove(sec->imgr);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver intel_m10bmc_secure_driver = {
>> + .probe = m10bmc_secure_probe,
>> + .remove = m10bmc_secure_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "n3000bmc-secure",
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(intel_m10bmc_secure_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:n3000bmc-secure");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel MAX10 BMC secure engine");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h b/include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h
>> index d4cb01b73357..7fe465c320c2 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h
>> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct intel_m10bmc {
>> * register access helper functions.
>> *
>> * m10bmc_raw_read - read m10bmc register per addr
>> + * m10bmc_raw_bulk_read - bulk_read max10 registers per addr
>> * m10bmc_sys_read - read m10bmc system register per offset
>> */
>> static inline int
>> @@ -79,6 +80,20 @@ m10bmc_raw_read(struct intel_m10bmc *m10bmc, unsigned int addr,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline int
>> +m10bmc_raw_bulk_read(struct intel_m10bmc *m10bmc, unsigned int addr,
>> + void *val, size_t cnt)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(m10bmc->regmap, addr, val, cnt);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_err(m10bmc->dev, "fail to read raw reg %x cnt %zx: %d\n",
>> + addr, cnt, ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> #define m10bmc_sys_read(m10bmc, offset, val) \
>> m10bmc_raw_read(m10bmc, M10BMC_SYS_BASE + (offset), val)
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> Thanks,
> Moritz