From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sd: do not set changed flag on all unit attention conditions
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:54:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5005285E.8060706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342514444.3039.23.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>
Il 17/07/2012 10:40, James Bottomley ha scritto:
>> >
>> > It's not specific to virtio-scsi, in fact I expect that virtio-scsi will
>> > be almost always used with non-removable disks.
>> >
>> > However, QEMU's SCSI target is not used just for virtio-scsi (for
>> > example it can be used for USB storage), and it lets you mark a disk as
>> > removable---why? because there exists real hardware that presents itself
>> > as an SBC removable disk. The only thing that is specific to
>> > virtualization, is support for online resizing (which generates a unit
>> > attention condition CAPACITY DATA HAS CHANGED).
> So what's the problem? If you're doing pass through of a physical disk,
> we pick up removable from its inquiry string ... a physical removable
> device doesn't get resized. If you have a virtual disk you want to
> resize, you don't set the removable flag in the inquiry data.
In practice people will do what you said, and it's not a problem.
However, there's nothing that prevents you from running qemu with a
removable SCSI disk, and then resizing it. I would like this to work,
because SBC allows it and there's no reason why it shouldn't.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-17 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-16 16:06 [PATCH] sd: do not set changed flag on all unit attention conditions Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-16 16:18 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-16 17:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 7:45 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-17 8:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 8:40 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-17 8:54 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-07-17 9:11 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-17 9:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 12:21 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-17 12:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 13:32 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-17 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-17 16:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 16:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-07-17 18:45 ` Mike Christie
2012-07-17 18:49 ` Mike Christie
2012-07-17 21:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-07-17 21:59 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-27 10:16 ` Hannes Reinecke
2012-07-25 12:09 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5005285E.8060706@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox