From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753305Ab2GWCbK (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:31:10 -0400 Received: from e28smtp07.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.7]:52597 "EHLO e28smtp07.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752884Ab2GWCbH (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:31:07 -0400 Message-ID: <500CB763.9020802@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:30:59 +0800 From: Michael Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: LKML , mingo@redhat.com, paul@paulmenage.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpusets: dynamical scheduler domain flags References: <50052A78.6000407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1342802550.2583.12.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1342802550.2583.12.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-cbid: 12072302-8878-0000-0000-00000357728A Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/21/2012 12:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 17:03 +0800, Michael Wang wrote: >> This patch set provide a way for user to dynamically configure the scheduler >> domain flags, which usually to be static. > > NAK.. you don't get to expose all this nonsense in a 'stable' ABI. > > You shouldn't need to prod at them to begin with. So is that means expose those domain flags to user is a bad idea at all? Is this caused by that people don't need such feature or this feature has do harm to kernel's stability?(it could be not...) Regards, Michael Wang > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >