linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix chip->base handling in of_gpio_simple_xlate()
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:43:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500D632B.3000206@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342977052-7880-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com>

(Cc: Arnd)

On 22.07.2012 19:10, Daniel Mack wrote:
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is called for each chip when a GPIO is looked up.
> When registering several chips off the same DT node (with different pin
> offsets) however, the lookup fails as the GPIO number passed in to
> of_gpio_simple_xlate() is likely higher than the chip's ->ngpio value.
> 
> Fix that by taking into account the chip's ->base value, and return the
> relative offset of the pin inside the chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
> ---
> 
> I'm currently porting the PXA pieces over to DT, and stumbled over what
> looks like an obvious bug to me. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but I see
> no reason why one shouldn't be able to instanciate several GPIO chips
> from a single DT node.
> 
> Thanks,
> Daniel
> 
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index d18068a..51bc232 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -147,13 +147,13 @@ int of_gpio_simple_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>  	if (WARN_ON(gpiospec->args_count < gc->of_gpio_n_cells))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (gpiospec->args[0] >= gc->ngpio)
> +	if (gpiospec->args[0] >= gc->ngpio + gc->base)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (flags)
>  		*flags = gpiospec->args[1];
>  
> -	return gpiospec->args[0];
> +	return gpiospec->args[0] - gc->base;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_gpio_simple_xlate);
>  
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-23 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-22 17:10 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix chip->base handling in of_gpio_simple_xlate() Daniel Mack
2012-07-23 14:43 ` Daniel Mack [this message]
2012-07-24 12:56   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-24 13:04     ` Daniel Mack
2012-07-24 14:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-07-24 15:22         ` Daniel Mack

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500D632B.3000206@gmail.com \
    --to=zonque@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).