public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Konstantin Khorenko <khorenko@parallels.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpu: intel, amd: mask cleared cpuid features
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:39:57 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <500FDB0D.7010105@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120725104346.GA11152@aftab.osrc.amd.com>

On 07/25/2012 02:43 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 02:31:23PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> So, you prefer adding some filtering of /proc/cpuinfo into the
>> mainstream kernel
> That's already there right? And your 1/2 patch was making toggling those
> bits easier.
>
>> (not now, later, for LXC to work) instead of enabling clearcpuid boot
>> option to mask CPUID features? IMO, the latter would look clearer.
> Yes, but for reasons noted earlier, you cannot tweak all hardware CPUID
> features as you want them.
>
> So, having a software-only layer of tweaking /proc/cpuinfo or something
> different you can come up with is the only option you have.
>
> And even in that case, applications running in the container which
> execute CPUID might fail in a strange manner when the corresponding
> /proc/cpuinfo flag was cleared by you intentionally but the hardware
> CPUID flag is there. In such situations, issues like that should
> probably be sorted on a case-by-case basis I guess.
>
> Thanks.
>

We've agreed that tweaking CPUID bits in kernel is not a good idea and 
it is better to think about virtualization of /proc/cpuinfo and using 
msr-tools.

Thank you for your time and feedback.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-25 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-20 16:37 [PATCH 1/2] cpu: common: make clearcpuid option take bits list Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-20 16:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpu: intel, amd: mask cleared cpuid features Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-20 17:10   ` Andi Kleen
2012-07-20 17:18     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-25 11:51     ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-20 17:20   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-20 18:21     ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-20 20:19       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-20 20:37         ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-21 10:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-24  7:06     ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-24  7:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-24  8:14       ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-24  8:29         ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-24 10:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-24 11:09             ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-24 12:34               ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-24 12:44                 ` Alan Cox
2012-07-25 10:31                   ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 10:58                     ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-25 11:02                       ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 11:17                         ` Andre Przywara
2012-07-25 11:43                           ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 11:31                     ` Alan Cox
2012-07-25 11:46                       ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 10:31                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 10:43                   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-25 11:39                     ` Vladimir Davydov [this message]
2012-07-25  0:57               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-25  6:58                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-25 14:13                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-07-25 11:49                 ` Vladimir Davydov
2012-07-24  9:50         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-07-24 10:32           ` Alan Cox
2012-07-24 11:04             ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=500FDB0D.7010105@parallels.com \
    --to=vdavydov@parallels.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=khorenko@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox