Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the mtd tree

[Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>]

Hi David,

On 07/25/2012 05:26 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:21 +0200, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
>>
>> So could someone please spend a few words on what happened in the meantime?
>> To me it looks like the l2-mtd tree got rebased at some point, but I'm
>> quite at loss about this whole back-and-forth between trees.
>> I'm sure a few words could make my life much easier... :-)
>
> There's no need to worry. The l2-mtd tree is rebased on top of the mtd
> tree, and contains patches that Artem thinks I'm likely to accept.
>
> I apply them, sometimes with a few minor changes, or I occasionally
> reject them. Sometimes if Artem doesn't *immediately* update his tree
> after I push changes to mine, a 'conflict' appears between the two. You
> can ignore it.
>

thanks for your explanation.
So, is it correct to say that any patch contained within l2-mtd (but 
*NOT* within linux-mtd) will eventually be killed? (Or rather, 
*replaced* by the version eventually applied to linux-mtd)?
In other words, when you say "Artem updates his tree", it is technically 
a rebase (so his version of a patch actually looks as if never existed), 
right?

Thanks a lot!
Gerlando