From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Lin Ming <minggr@gmail.com>, Jeff Wu <jeff.wu@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] ZPODD patches for scsi tree
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:04:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50118690.7030501@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120726144108.GA2724@localhost.localdomain>
On 07/26/2012 10:41 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:43:37AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 06:05 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
>>> I can't set a flag in libata-acpi.c since a related function is
>>> missing in scsi-misc tree. Will fix this when 3.6-rc1 released.
>> What does this mean? Would you be more specific?
> The patch "libata-acpi: add ata port runtime D3Cold support" by Lin Ming
> introduced a function ata_acpi_wake_dev in libata-acpi.c, and only lives
> in libata-next tree but not scsi-misc tree.
[...]
> Another minor issue is, I need to use the can_power_off and
> wakeup_by_user flag of the scsi_device structure in sr patches, but
> they are all introduced in patches in libata-next tree, so I have to
> re-define them in this patch set. Will cause conflict if James send
> these sr patches to Linus. Any way to avoid this?
Linus said he just merged the libata patches, so they should appear in
the torvalds/linux.git as soon as he pushes out (in the next 12 hours,
I'm guessing).
Up to James how he wants to coordinate after that... he might pull in
Linus's tree into scsi-misc or another solution.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 10:05 [PATCH v3 0/7] ZPODD patches for scsi tree Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] scsi: sr: check support for device busy class events Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] scsi: pm: use autosuspend if device supports it Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-07-26 12:43 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 13:01 ` Oliver Neukum
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] scsi: sr: support zero power ODD(ZPODD) Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] scsi: sr: block events when runtime suspended Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] scsi: pm: use runtime resume callback if available Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] scsi: sr: balance sr disk events block depth Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:54 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-07-26 12:47 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] block: genhd: add an interface to set disk's poll interval Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 13:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] ZPODD patches for scsi tree Jeff Garzik
2012-07-26 14:41 ` Aaron Lu
2012-07-26 18:04 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50118690.7030501@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=aaron.lu@amd.com \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff.wu@amd.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minggr@gmail.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox