From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751889Ab2G0GrY (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 02:47:24 -0400 Received: from hqemgate04.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.35]:5910 "EHLO hqemgate04.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485Ab2G0GrX (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2012 02:47:23 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp08.nvidia.com on Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:47:23 -0700 Message-ID: <501236D3.3050505@nvidia.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 12:06:03 +0530 From: Laxman Dewangan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Warren CC: Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , Gyungoh Yoo , Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: add MAX8907 core driver References: <1343331630-27126-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> In-Reply-To: <1343331630-27126-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 27 July 2012 01:10 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > From: Gyungoh Yoo > > +static int max8907_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on) > +{ > + /* Everything happens in max8907_irq_sync_unlock */ > + Probably you need to call the wake_enable of irq which goes to the cpu here. > + if (device_may_wakeup(chip->dev)) > + enable_irq_wake(i2c->irq); > + else > + disable_irq(i2c->irq); I think lets sub devices decide the wakeups rather than it is done by the core. > + max8907->i2c_rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, MAX8907_RTC_I2C_ADDR); > + if (!max8907->i2c_rtc) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + goto err_dummy_rtc; > + } > + i2c_set_clientdata(max8907->i2c_rtc, max8907); > + max8907->regmap_rtc = devm_regmap_init_i2c(i2c, > +&max8907_regmap_rtc_config); the argiment should be max8907->i2c_rtc rather than i2c here.