Re: [net-next RFC V5 4/5] virtio_net: multiqueue support

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 07/29/2012 05:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:48:35PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>> +	}
>>>>
>>>> -	if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ)) {
>>>> +	ret = vi->vdev->config->find_vqs(vi->vdev, total_vqs, vqs, callbacks,
>>>> +					 (const char **)names);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (vi->has_cvq)
>>>>   		vi->cvq = vqs[2];
>>>>
>>>> -		if (virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VLAN))
>>>> -			vi->dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER;
>>>> +	for (i = 0; i<   vi->num_queue_pairs * 2; i += 2) {
>>>> +		int j = i == 0 ? i : i + vi->has_cvq;
>>>> +		vi->rq[i / 2]->vq = vqs[j];
>>>> +		vi->sq[i / 2]->vq = vqs[j + 1];
>>> Same here.
>> Consider the code is really simple, seem no need to use helpers.
> Well it was not simple to at least one reader :)
> The problem is not this logic is complex,
> it is that it is spread all over the code.
>
> If we had e.g. vnet_tx_vqn_to_queuenum vnet_tx_queuenum_to_vqn
> and same for rx, then the logic would all be
> in one place, and have a tidy comment on top explaining
> the VQ numbering scheme.
>

Looks reasonable, thanks.