From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754480Ab2GaO00 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:26:26 -0400 Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:53203 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754089Ab2GaO0Y convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:26:24 -0400 Message-ID: <5017EB0C.6050908@parallels.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:26:20 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Bruce Fields" CC: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@openvz.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Lockd: grace period containerization References: <20120725125258.24376.82525.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20120727215431.GE6388@fieldses.org> <50165C0D.1070200@parallels.com> <20120731141909.GB27834@fieldses.org> In-Reply-To: <20120731141909.GB27834@fieldses.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 31.07.2012 18:19, J. Bruce Fields пишет: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:03:57PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> 28.07.2012 01:54, J. Bruce Fields пишет: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 04:55:45PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >>>> Bruce, I feel this patch set is ready for inclusion. >>>> >>>> v2: >>>> 1) Rebase on Bruce's "for-3.6" branch. >>>> >>>> This patch set makes grace period and hosts reclaiming network namespace >>>> aware. >>> >>> On a quick skim--yes, that looks reasonable to me. >>> >>> It doesn't help with active/active cluster exports, because in that case >>> we need some additional coordination between nfsd's. >>> >>> But it looks good enough to handle the case where each filesystem is >>> exported from at most one server at a time, which is more than we >>> currently handle. >>> >>> It's a little late for 3.6. Also I get the impression Al Viro has some >>> lockd rework in progress, which we may want to wait for. >>> >>> So I'll likely look again into queueing this up for 3.7 once 3.6-rc1 is >>> out. >> >> >> Ok. >> Will Al Viro's lockd rework be a part of 3.6 kernel? > > Actually I think it mostly won't be. > > And this looks pretty safe, really. I've gone ahead and merged it. > Nice to hear. Thanks, Bruce. -- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky