Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Better handling of insane CMOS values

John Stultz
2012-07-31T17:50:37Z

On 07/30/2012 11:35 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> I've also only been able to lightly test. If you want to try this out
> you can add the following to timekeeping_init after the
> read_persistent_clock() call:
>
> now.tv_sec = 196469280000LL;
Prarit noted that I implemented these patches against 3.5 (what the
problem was reported against) and not Linus' head.

I'm mostly just looking for input on the approach, but just in case
anyone else wanted to actually play with these patches, they'll need to
do so against 3.5. I'll update the patchset against Linus' tree before
I send them out again.

Sorry about that.

thanks
-john