linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@redhat.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr()
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:32:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50192FF5.1060208@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120801130118.GA2386@redhat.com>

On 08/01/2012 03:01 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Lets ignore uprobes which needs the changes anyway. This is
> only used by ptrace and the task is stopped. So, unless I missed
> something obvious, this update_debugctlmsr() is simply unneeded,
> __switch_to/__switch_to_xtra should notice _TIF_BLOCKSTEP and do
> update_debugctlmsr(DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF).

It looks like it unless a processes ptraces itself (which does not make
much sense anyway).

> But, worse, isn't it wrong? Suppose that debugger switches to
> another TIF_SINGLESTEP&&  !TIF_BLOCKSTEP task, in this case
> we "leak" DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF, no?

__switch_to_xtra() should notice the difference in the TIF_BLOCKSTEP
flag and disable it.

> IOW, it seems to me we could safely remove update_debugctlmsr()
> arch/x86/kernel/step.c. However, if we want to re-use this code
> in uprobes, then we probably need to add "if (child == current)".
It looks that way.

>
> Or I am totally confused. Help!
>
> Oleg.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-01 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26 15:20 [PATCH] uprobes: don't enable/disable signle step if the user did it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-26 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-27 17:39   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-27 18:04     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-26 17:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-30 11:06 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-30 14:16   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-30 15:15     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31  4:01     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31  5:22     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-31 17:38       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 11:52     ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 11:52       ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 17:51         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 19:30           ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 12:26             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:01               ` Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:32                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-08-01 13:46                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:54                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:01                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:21                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:31                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:47                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:51                             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:01                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 15:12                                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:14                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 18:46                                     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-02 13:05                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02 13:20                                         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-02 13:24                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:43         ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02  4:58           ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31 17:40       ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50192FF5.1060208@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).