From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ananth@in.ibm.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@redhat.com,
srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr()
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:46:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50197994.4090800@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120801151442.GA9697@redhat.com>
On 08/01/2012 05:14 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/01, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>
>> On 08/01/2012 05:01 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 08/01, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>>> So a patch like
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/step.c
>>>> @@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static void enable_step(struct task_struct *child,
>>>> bool block)
>>>> unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
>>>>
>>>> debugctl |= DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF;
>>>> - update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
>>>> set_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP);
>>>> + update_debugctlmsr(debugctl);
>>>> } else if (test_tsk_thread_flag(child, TIF_BLOCKSTEP)) {
>>>> unsigned long debugctl = get_debugctlmsr();
>>>>
>>>> should fix the race
>>>
>>> No, I don't think it can fix something ;) or make any difference.
>>
>> Why? You _first_ set the task flag
>
> Yes, and this task is "child".
>
>> followed by the CPU register. Now
>> switch_to() would see the bit set and act.
>
> child sleeps and doesn't participate in switch_to(). Debugger and another
> (unrelated) task do.
This is confusing.
In order to allow the debugger to ptrace()->enable_blockstep() the
child has to be stopped/traced. We switch X86_EFLAGS_TF in child's regs
and enable DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF for the debugger which is wrong. If we quit
to userspace then the CPU on which the debugger runs has
DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF. If the tracee task runs on the same then nothing
happens, the bit remains set.
If the tracee happens to run on a different CPU then switch_to() will
enable the DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF bit for the debugger's CPU and switch_to()
will enable it also on the other CPU.
I added a few printks in the source and I see output that
__switch_to_xtra() enables the bit as well as in enable_single() for
debugger's CPU. I didn't find where the single step is disabled for the
tracee. I haven't notice this in __switch_to_xtra() nor or in
disable_single_step().
> Oleg.
>
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 15:20 [PATCH] uprobes: don't enable/disable signle step if the user did it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-26 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-27 17:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-27 18:04 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-26 17:38 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-30 11:06 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-30 14:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-30 15:15 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 4:01 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31 5:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-07-31 17:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 11:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 11:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-07-31 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-07-31 19:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 12:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:01 ` Q: user_enable_single_step() && update_debugctlmsr() Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 13:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 14:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 14:51 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 15:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-01 15:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 18:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-08-02 13:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02 13:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-02 13:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-01 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/uprobes: implement x86 specific arch_uprobe_*_step Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-02 4:58 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-07-31 17:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] uprobes: Use a helper instead of ptrace's single step enable Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50197994.4090800@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).