From: Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@gmail.com>
To: Chris Jones <chrisjones@spin.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Gaming and the kernel
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 08:46:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501C54AF.4090001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501C4CCE.8020806@spin.net.au>
Sorry, had to send this again so it could go to the mailing list. I
accidentally replied to you personally :\
On 04/08/12 08:12, Chris Jones wrote:
> There's a lot of attention at the moment focused toward Linux and the
> future of gaming support on the platform. And it got me thinking, is
> there any particular improvements that are planned to improve the
> kernel from better support for gaming?
>
>
> Regards
>
Hi Chris,
The biggest problem I can see at the moment is supporting dual-GPU
setups in unusual ways.
For example, NVIDIA Optimus uses an Intel Core i* processor and
integrated Intel 3/4000 graphics,
but also has a NVIDIA GeForge GT *M graphics card. However, this card
cannot be accessed
directly, and all instructions effectively pass through the Intel
graphics system.
I'm not entirely sure how that works, but it's what I've managed to
gather from some tinkering.
It's being worked on at the moment (RandR 1.(5? 6? 7?) and DMA-BUF
PRIME) - Which is good,
since the majority of laptops that I have seen being sold in my area
either use NVIDIA
Optimus or some other similar system if they cost under $1000 or so.
Until these are implemented, there is no way for the kernel to access
the dedicated graphics
card on these systems. There is, however, a project (Bumblebee) that
seems to be doing
a good job performance-wise, but doesn't support automatic switching to
the dedicated
graphics card.
On another note, not kernel based, Wine has actually managed to run
Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas faster on Ubuntu 12.04 than the default
Windows 7
installation on this laptop. Valve has also committed to developing
games on Linux
(starting with Ubuntu) with frame rates that, so far, have been higher
than on Windows.
I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens. There are a couple
of things (some
of which are major, but thankfully not impossible)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-03 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 22:12 Gaming and the kernel Chris Jones
2012-08-03 22:46 ` Cruz Julian Bishop [this message]
[not found] ` <501C545C.40601@gmail.com>
2012-08-04 0:25 ` Chris Jones
2012-08-04 0:32 ` david
2012-08-04 0:51 ` Chris Jones
2012-08-04 4:12 ` valdis.kletnieks
2012-08-04 4:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2012-08-04 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501C54AF.4090001@gmail.com \
--to=cruzjbishop@gmail.com \
--cc=chrisjones@spin.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox