public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: fix set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 17:29:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50213462.5040304@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120807151531.GC13476@redhat.com>

On 08/07/2012 05:15 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> It turns out, original code is even more buggy than I thought.
>
> Ironically, "task != current" case is more difficult and so far
> I do not see how we can handle this case correctly. I'll return
> to this a bit later, currently I am working on other patches.

maybe you could remove the autodectect mode and add helper for uprobe
which disables it.

>> For uprobes we never set the bit, we only need it cleared.
>
> Yes, at least at first step, and probably we will never need more.
>
>> We get here
>> via int 3 and do_debug() already clears TIF_BLOCKSTEP
>
> No, we get here via do_int3(), TIF_BLOCKSTEP is not cleared,

Yes, Sorry. my fault.

>> because the
>> CPU clears the bit in CPU.
>
> I am not sure. The manual says:
>
> 	 If the BTF flag is set when the processor generates a debug
> 	 exception, the processor clears the BTF flag along with the
> 	 TF flag.
>
> but I am not sure "debug exception" also means "breakpoint exception".
>
>
>
> do_debug() does clear TIF_BLOCKSTEP, and "The processor cleared BTF"
> is true in this case. But it is called after single-step.

I was wrong here in regard to do_debug() since do_int3() is correct.
Anyway, I checked it on real hardware and I saw the CPU in do_int3()
with BTF set after executing int3 with TF flag set and the BTF bit.

>
> Oleg.

Sebastian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-07 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-03 16:29 [PATCH 0/2] ptrace: DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF fixes Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-03 16:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: introduce set_task_blockstep() helper Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-03 16:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] ptrace: fix set_task_blockstep()->update_debugctlmsr() logic Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-03 16:43   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-03 17:38     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-03 18:28       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 15:13         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07  9:41   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 10:52     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 15:15     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07 15:29       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2012-08-07 15:31         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07 15:12   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-06 16:14 ` [PATCH 0/2] ptrace: DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF fixes Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 15:15   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-08-07 15:38     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-07 15:46       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50213462.5040304@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox