From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, prarit@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks on v3.6
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:20:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5021CCD3.5060301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5020ECF2.4040006@gmail.com>
On 08/07/2012 06:24 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 07:40 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 08/06/2012 11:28 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2012 08:20 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>>>> On 08/06/2012 10:21 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>>>> On 08/05/2012 09:55 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/30/2012 03:17 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>>>>> Possible causes:
>>>>>>> - the APIC calibration in the guest failed, so it is programming too
>>>>>>> low values into the timer
>>>>>>> - it actually needs 1 us wakeups and then can't keep up (esp. as kvm
>>>>>>> interrupt injection is slowing it down)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can try to find out by changing
>>>>>>> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c:start_lapic_timer() to impose a minimum wakeup of
>>>>>>> (say) 20 microseconds which will let the guest live long enough for you
>>>>>>> to ftrace it and see what kind of timers it is programming.
>>>>>> I've kept trying to narrow it down, and found out It's triggerable using adjtimex().
>>>> Sorry, one more question: Could you provide details on how is it trigger-able using adjtimex?
>>> It triggers after a while of fuzzing using trinity of just adjtimex ('./trinity --quiet -l off -cadjtimex').
>>>
>>> Trinity is available here: http://git.codemonkey.org.uk/?p=trinity.git .
>>>
>>> Let me know if I can help further with reproducing this, I can probably copy over my testing environment to some other host if you'd like.
>>
>> Ok. Finally I *think* got it reproduced. (Had some trouble initially, as I think since the first time I ran it as a normal user, the socket cache isn't the same as if you run it the first time as root? Anyway, after doing a make clean and rebuilding it started to trigger).
>>
>> I'm not seeing the rcu stall message, but I do manage to trigger two other behaviors: a hard hang and a sort of zombie state where memory isn't properly being freed & everything starts segfaulting. So this may not be the exact same issue, but it triggers quickly as you described (within a few seconds of running trinity as root).
>>
>> It looks like both of these issues are caused by adjtimex(ADJ_SETOFFSET), which adds or subtracts a huge offset and that either goes negative or gets clamped to a ktime_t at KTIME_MAX (if you get clamped the system hangs, if it goes negative, the system barely functions, but sort of drags along).
>>
>> An updated version of my KTIME_MAX sanity checking patch to handle both of these conditions is below.
>>
>> Would you mind giving this patch a shot and letting me know if you still see problems?
>
> This fixes the problem for me. Thanks!
Could you please also try to reduce the CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT
from 60 to 3 and see whether the rcu stall info will show again?(sorry I
can't do it by my self since the stall info never appear in my sight...)
That will be very helpful as I suppose it is time to recover
CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT to a reasonable value now ;-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 17:10 rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks on v3.6 Sasha Levin
2012-07-24 17:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-07-24 20:55 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-25 8:36 ` Michael Wang
2012-07-25 21:16 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-26 5:10 ` Michael Wang
2012-07-25 9:06 ` Michael Wang
2012-07-26 11:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-27 11:27 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-29 12:48 ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-29 21:05 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-30 5:36 ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-30 9:13 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-30 9:33 ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-30 12:43 ` Sasha Levin
2012-07-30 13:17 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-05 16:55 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-06 17:21 ` John Stultz
2012-08-06 18:12 ` John Stultz
2012-08-06 18:20 ` John Stultz
2012-08-06 18:28 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-06 20:31 ` John Stultz
2012-08-06 20:35 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-07 5:05 ` Michael Wang
2012-08-07 5:40 ` John Stultz
2012-08-07 10:24 ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-08 2:20 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2012-08-06 19:24 ` Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5021CCD3.5060301@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).