From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932853Ab2HHSnW (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:43:22 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:34551 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752631Ab2HHSnT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 14:43:19 -0400 Message-ID: <5022B342.7080606@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:43:14 -0600 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Prisk CC: vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Florian Tobias Schandinat , Alan Stern , Eric Andersson , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Hauke Mehrtens , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Neil Zhang , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alan Cox , Alessandro Zummo , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm: vt8500: Add device tree files for VIA/Wondermedia SoC's References: <1344389967-8465-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <1344389967-8465-2-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <1344389967-8465-2-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5a1pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/07/2012 07:39 PM, Tony Prisk wrote: > Add device tree files for VT8500, WM8505 and WM8650 SoC's and > reference boards. > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500_ref.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vt8500_ref.dts It appears more typical to use "-" rather than "_" in the filename to join SoC and board names. I guess "_ref" means "reference". Is that how the boards are commonly known? Are you sure there will never be another reference board for these SoCs? Given the "model" values in the file, something more like vt8500-bv07.dts might be more appropriate? > + /* > + * Display node is based on Sascha Hauer's patch on dri-devel. > + * Added a bpp property to calculate the size of the framebuffer > + * until the binding is formalized. > + */ > + display { Maybe it's better to just hold off on adding this node, to wait until the binding is complete so this file doesn't churn? Certainly it sounded like Sascha was going to change the binding a little in response to comments it received.