From: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
john.johansen@canonical.com
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in selinux_ip_postroute_compat
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:14:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5022BAA2.90606@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502198B4.8040503@linaro.org>
On 08/07/2012 03:37 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 03:17 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Paul Moore (paul@paul-moore.com):
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:58 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 08/07/2012 02:50 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:12 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> With my kvm environment using 3.6-rc1+, I'm seeing NULL
>>>>>> pointer
>>>>>> dereferences in selinux_ip_postroute_compat(). It looks like the
>>>>>> sksec
>>>>>> value
>>>>>> is null and we die in the following line:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (selinux_xfrm_postroute_last(sksec->sid, skb, &ad, proto))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This triggers every time I shutdown the machine, but has also
>>>>>> triggered
>>>>>> randomly after a few hours.
[snip]
>> The problem seems to be that selinux_nf_ip_init() was called, which
>> registers the selinux_ipv4_ops (and ipv6). Those should not get
>> registered
>> if selinux ends up not being loaded (as in, if apparmor is loaded
>> first),
>> since as you've found here the selinux lsm hooks won't be called to set
>> call selinux_sk_alloc_security().
> This sounds about right:
> root@testvm:~# dmesg | grep SELinux
> [ 0.004578] SELinux: Initializing.
> [ 0.005704] SELinux: Starting in permissive mode
> [ 2.235034] SELinux: Registering netfilter hooks
>
>> I assume what's happening is that
>> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE was
>> set to 1, but selinux ended up being set to disabled after the
>> __initcall(selinux_nf_ip_init) ran? Weird.
> This looks right as well:
>
> # zcat config.gz | grep SELINUX
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_BOOTPARAM_VALUE=1
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DISABLE=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_DEVELOP=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_AVC_STATS=y
> CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_CHECKREQPROT_VALUE=1
> # CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_POLICYDB_VERSION_MAX is not set
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY_SELINUX=y
>
>
> Since the problem isn't completely obvious, I'm starting a bisection
> to narrow this down some more.
So I bisected this down and it seems to be the following commit:
commit be9f4a44e7d41cee50ddb5f038fc2391cbbb4046
Author: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: Thu Jul 19 07:34:03 2012 +0000
ipv4: tcp: remove per net tcp_sock
It doesn't revert totally cleanly, but after fixing up the rejections
and booting with this patch removed on top of Linus' head the oops on
shutdown goes away.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 18:12 NULL pointer dereference in selinux_ip_postroute_compat John Stultz
2012-08-07 21:50 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-07 21:58 ` John Stultz
2012-08-07 22:01 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-07 22:17 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2012-08-07 22:23 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-07 22:37 ` John Stultz
2012-08-08 19:14 ` John Stultz [this message]
2012-08-08 19:26 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-08 19:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 19:49 ` John Stultz
2012-08-08 20:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 19:50 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-08 20:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 19:59 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-08 20:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 20:46 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-08 21:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 0:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2012-08-09 13:30 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 14:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 15:04 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 14:50 ` [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: security_sk_alloc() needed for unicast_sock Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 15:07 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 15:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 15:59 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 16:05 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-09 16:09 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 20:06 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-09 20:19 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-09 21:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 21:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2012-08-09 22:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-09 22:26 ` Casey Schaufler
2012-08-09 23:38 ` David Miller
2012-08-09 23:56 ` [PATCH] ipv4: tcp: unicast_sock should not land outside of TCP stack Eric Dumazet
2012-08-10 4:05 ` David Miller
2012-08-08 20:35 ` NULL pointer dereference in selinux_ip_postroute_compat Paul Moore
2012-08-08 20:51 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-08 21:03 ` Paul Moore
2012-08-08 21:09 ` Eric Paris
2012-08-08 19:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-08-08 16:58 ` John Johansen
2012-08-07 22:26 ` John Stultz
2012-08-07 22:31 ` John Stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5022BAA2.90606@us.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox