Re: [PATCH] perf: Add a new sort order: SORT_INCLUSIVE (v6)

[Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>]

On 3/30/12 10:43 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> [ Meant to include v6 ChangeLog as well. Technical difficulties.. ]
>
> v6 ChangeLog:
>
> rebased to tip:perf/core and fixed a minor problem in computing
> the total period in hists__remove_entry_filter(). Needed to
> use period_self instead of period.

This patch breaks perf top (symptom: percentages > 100%). Fixed by the 
following patch.

Namhyung: if you're still working on forward porting this, please add 
this fix to your queue.

  -Arun

commit 75a1c409a529c9741f8a2f493868d1fc7ce7e06d
Author: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Date:   Wed Aug 8 11:47:02 2012 -0700

    perf: update period_self as well on collapsing
       When running perf top, we have a series of incoming samples,
    which get aggregated in various user specified ways.
       Suppose function "foo" had the following samples:
    101, 103, 99, 105, ...
       ->period for the corresponding entry looks as follows:
    101, 204, 303, 408, ...
       However, due to this bug, ->period_self contains:
    101, 103, 99, 105, ...
       and therefore breaks the invariant period == period_self
    in the default mode (no sort inclusive).
       Since total_period is computed by summing up period_self,
       period/total_period can be > 100%
       Fix the bug by updating period_self as well.
       Signed-off-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index a2a8d91..adc891e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -462,6 +462,7 @@ static bool hists__collapse_insert_entry(struct 
hists *hists,

		if (!cmp) {
			iter->period += he->period;
+			iter->period_self += he->period_self;
			iter->nr_events += he->nr_events;
			if (symbol_conf.use_callchain) {
				callchain_cursor_reset(&hists->callchain_cursor);