* [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry
@ 2012-08-10 14:05 Masatake YAMATO
2012-08-10 18:31 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Masatake YAMATO @ 2012-08-10 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry.
Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index b4c3582..2b822ac 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -1963,6 +1963,9 @@ struct proto udp_prot = {
.compat_getsockopt = compat_udp_getsockopt,
#endif
.clear_sk = sk_prot_clear_portaddr_nulls,
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
+ .has_own_proc_entry= 1,
+#endif
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_prot);
--
1.7.11.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry
2012-08-10 14:05 [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry Masatake YAMATO
@ 2012-08-10 18:31 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-10 19:16 ` Jan Ceuleers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-10 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Masatake YAMATO; +Cc: linux-kernel
On 08/10/2012 04:05 PM, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index b4c3582..2b822ac 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1963,6 +1963,9 @@ struct proto udp_prot = {
> .compat_getsockopt = compat_udp_getsockopt,
> #endif
> .clear_sk = sk_prot_clear_portaddr_nulls,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
> + .has_own_proc_entry= 1,
> +#endif
> };
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_prot);
>
>
Two points:
- I haven't seen patch 01/15;
- these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry
2012-08-10 18:31 ` Jan Ceuleers
@ 2012-08-10 19:16 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-11 8:36 ` Masatake YAMATO
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Ceuleers @ 2012-08-10 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Masatake YAMATO, linux-kernel
On 08/10/2012 08:31 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> Two points:
>
> - I haven't seen patch 01/15;
Correction: I have.
> - these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml
But this is still the case; MAINTAINERS would have told you that.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry
2012-08-10 19:16 ` Jan Ceuleers
@ 2012-08-11 8:36 ` Masatake YAMATO
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Masatake YAMATO @ 2012-08-11 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jan.ceuleers; +Cc: linux-kernel
> On 08/10/2012 08:31 PM, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>> Two points:
>>
>> - I haven't seen patch 01/15;
>
> Correction: I have.
>
>> - these patches should go to netdev rather than lkml
>
> But this is still the case; MAINTAINERS would have told you that.
Thanks. After reflecting the suggestion from Alan Cox to the patches,
I will v2 patches to netdev.
Masatake YAMATO
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-11 8:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-10 14:05 [PATCH 02/15] Declaring udp protocols has its own proc entry Masatake YAMATO
2012-08-10 18:31 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-10 19:16 ` Jan Ceuleers
2012-08-11 8:36 ` Masatake YAMATO
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox