From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756231Ab2HNOya (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:54:30 -0400 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143]:47834 "EHLO radon.swed.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752664Ab2HNOyS (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:54:18 -0400 Message-ID: <502A6696.4030200@nod.at> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:54:14 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120427 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Howells CC: Rusty Russell , Randy Dunlap , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML , user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml) References: <502A613F.1090600@nod.at> <87a9xys53h.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20120726150419.0de645e8750e3a15fa0f1aaa@canb.auug.org.au> <50115FCF.4060708@xenotime.net> <502932A0.3060001@xenotime.net> <15532.1344954413@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <15981.1344955883@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <15981.1344955883@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDC65854493518245CE064E31" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDC65854493518245CE064E31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 14.08.2012 16:51, schrieb David Howells: > Richard Weinberger wrote: >=20 >> Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch? >> Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64. >=20 > Or ppc or ia64? Or are those defunct? Those are defunct. AFAIK viro is working on UML/ppc64. > I can certainly try pasting the lines from x86/Kconfig to uml/Kconfig.c= ommon > to switch the REL/RELA bits, but it would be nice to get this from the = actual > arch if possible to reduce redundancy. The issue happens only on -next, right? I can have a closer look at the issue tomorrow. Thanks, //richard --------------enigDC65854493518245CE064E31 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQKmaXAAoJEN9758yqZn9eLOgH/1Er70Qz04+e70Ga1vIAsYvI cwCi+G75LBUC6T3W1N4AF7QW3WzEiy1+4+AJd0SJIntp0EDcpTqJ0XM9lEyD7jRp S1qc4+Ls6xMEUcDCnOiiLll2u/7TJRcTrUmxCWYI+AvN9JAvNsMWWHgweDxUA917 /MbjnRl6TtAgD0mZdIUFbSDKQNPLWv6ItRmm5EX5Ddl0RjMOT8hEGdOIAPcNNrTJ PFp8cRCt3rt7LHdwnec1E5iymAP/aPPiAFCNgpAPs1xz190f4EdCjvwe6lrtGSmX PnyhU7eimWghKCaX7mdhd4iL7/w/pnUc7LwYfZ4nBSgwgASuhej5rutFhuTDSnU= =8dnn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDC65854493518245CE064E31--