From: "Wouter M. Koolen" <W.M.Koolen-Wijkstra@cwi.nl>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] make clean problematic bashism
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:39:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502B7C77.3010005@cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1345026408.31459.60.camel@twins>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]
On 08/15/2012 12:26 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 11:52 +0200, Wouter M. Koolen wrote:
>> Dear perf maintainers,
>>
>> I attempted to compile perf 3.5.1 without worrying about installing
>> dependencies first. The resulting error messages were quite helpful, and
>> led me to install a bunch of development libraries and flex.
>>
>> Unfortunately, after installing flex the build still failed, even after
>> make clean.
>>
>> The reason for this was a bunch of generated empty flex files in util/
>> that were not removed by make clean. They are intended to be erased,
>> since the Makefile executes
>>
>> rm -f util/*-{bison,flex}*
>>
>> however, this command does not remove the files. I guess because {,}
>> alternatives are only special in bash but the makefile is run with some
>> other shell?
>
> ISTR us getting a number of such patches, did we miss a site, acme?
>
>> I got perf to compile now, but thought you would be interested to know
>> about this little problem.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Wouter Koolen
>>
>>
>> PS: as a side note: GNU make has the .DELETE_ON_ERROR: special target,
>> which removes the target file when its generating command fails. This
>> would have prevented my problem and sounds like a good idea in general.
>> Maybe perf could make use of this feature when on GNU make?
>
> I don't think we build with anything but gnu make, mind sending a patch
> implementing your suggestion?
Hi Peter,
Some more information: my system has /bin/sh set to dash. I remember a
question about this during Debian installation. I guess Ubuntu does
something similar viz. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/4/90
Patch attached :)
With kind regards,
Wouter
[-- Attachment #2: delete_on_error --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 258 bytes --]
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
index 0eee64c..29b2373 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+.DELETE_ON_ERROR:
+
include ../scripts/Makefile.include
# The default target of this Makefile is...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-15 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 9:52 [perf] make clean problematic bashism Wouter M. Koolen
2012-08-15 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-15 10:39 ` Wouter M. Koolen [this message]
2012-08-15 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502B7C77.3010005@cwi.nl \
--to=w.m.koolen-wijkstra@cwi.nl \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox