From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
balbi@ti.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de,
aletes.xgr@gmail.com, kevin.wells@nxp.com,
srinivas.bakki@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: Port to new start/stop interface
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 11:10:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502E0A7B.1040607@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502D1CC2.9020901@antcom.de>
Hi,
On 08/16/2012 06:16 PM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 06:05 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c
>>> @@ -2987,14 +2986,14 @@ static irqreturn_t lpc32xx_usb_vbus_irq(
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int lpc32xx_start(struct usb_gadget_driver *driver,
>>> - int (*bind)(struct usb_gadget *))
>>> +static int lpc32xx_start(struct usb_gadget *gadget,
>>> + struct usb_gadget_driver *driver)
>>> {
>>> - struct lpc32xx_udc *udc =&controller;
>>
>> I assume controller is a global var created at probe time and could be
>> removed now, right?
>
> Yes!
Well ;-) looking more closely into it, I'd like to keep it for now: It
is a more complex statically pre-initialized struct, finally being used
in probe() for more dynamic initialization, and it ends up being used by
many other functions, including lpc32xx_start() where accessing it now
via container_of() is just a bit more elegant than a direct &controller
of the global variable.
Also, since this device is a single controller in the LPC32xx SoC, I
would keep it until some other silicon uses several of this IP core
(which I doubt), at which point we would probably still keep the (global
static) controller and memcpy it to a dynamically allocated struct.
Sounds reasonable?
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-16 15:34 [PATCH] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: Port to new start/stop interface Roland Stigge
2012-08-16 16:05 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-16 16:16 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-17 9:10 ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-08-17 9:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-17 10:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-19 12:33 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-20 7:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-20 8:11 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-17 10:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-17 11:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-17 11:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-08-17 11:28 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-17 11:32 ` Roland Stigge
2012-08-17 11:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-08-19 12:48 ` Roland Stigge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502E0A7B.1040607@antcom.de \
--to=stigge@antcom.de \
--cc=aletes.xgr@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kevin.wells@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.bakki@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox