linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cross-distro@lists.linaro.org" <cross-distro@lists.linaro.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: root=PARTUUID for MBR/NT disk signatures?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:38:39 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50332CEF.7010204@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqD9hY-Z9uBcYyeCa=8f8eeXkGNjPKxbwpMPi3vs3776vF6iQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 21.08.2012 08:47, Will Drewry wrote:
[]
> Functionally, I suspect this will work fine, but I am concerned that
> it is a bad move from an efficiency perspective (not unfixable
> though).  Right now, the user-supplied value is converted from
> string-uuid to packed-uuid.  This is then memcmp'd across any and all
> partitions - be it 2 or 200 - across all attached storage.  If we move
> to a pure string, then we end up needing to unpack every packed UUID
> at disk scan time (or search, depending on impl) rather than just the
> one user supplied value.
> 
> Perhaps the cost is negligible on modern machines, but it seems like
> the wrong place to put the cost (per entry rather than per search
> value).

Amount of work needed to READ all the partition tables might be
quite a bit larger than strcmp'ing it all.  I think.

/mjt

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-21  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-17 22:10 root=PARTUUID for MBR/NT disk signatures? Stephen Warren
2012-08-20 18:22 ` Tejun Heo
2012-08-20 18:30   ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-21  4:47     ` Will Drewry
2012-08-21  6:38       ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2012-08-21 18:08       ` Stephen Warren
2012-08-21 18:47         ` Will Drewry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50332CEF.7010204@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).