From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 19:30:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50363.1304379012@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200." <201105030044.51661.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]
On Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said:
> + if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disabled()))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
Since this is a "no user serviceable parts inside" type of error, so I guess
WARN_ON rather than a printk(KERN_WARNING is a good idea so we get
a traceback pointing out the offending driver.
I have to wonder 2 things though:
1) What percent of the time the missing firmware (or other issues, like the
display not being resumed yet) will prevent the WARN_ON output from making it
to the display *anyhow*, so the user *still* hits the power button to try again?
2) What percent of the time the WARN_ON output will itself make the user
think the resume has died rather than just being slow, causing them to power
cycle and hope for a clean boot?
Maybe something like this instead?
if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disable()))) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "Resume continuing, but firmware for %s not loaded", device);
return -EBUSY;
}
(or whatever that %s actually needs to work)
All the same, it still looks better than what we're doing now.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 22:44 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-02 23:12 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-02 23:28 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-03 14:05 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-03 11:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 14:06 ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 17:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 15:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-03 15:56 ` Joe Perches
2011-05-03 17:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201105031914.18160.rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-05-03 18:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50363.1304379012@localhost \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox