public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 19:30:12 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50363.1304379012@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200." <201105030044.51661.rjw@sisk.pl>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1079 bytes --]

On Tue, 03 May 2011 00:44:51 +0200, "Rafael J. Wysocki" said:

> +	if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disabled()))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +

Since this is a "no user serviceable parts inside" type of error, so I guess
WARN_ON rather than a printk(KERN_WARNING is a good idea so we get
a traceback pointing out the offending driver.

I have to wonder 2 things though:

1) What percent of the time the missing firmware (or other issues, like the
display not being resumed yet) will prevent the WARN_ON output from making it
to the display *anyhow*, so the user *still* hits the power button to try again?

2) What percent of the time the WARN_ON output will itself make the user
think the resume has died rather than just being slow, causing them to power
cycle and hope for a clean boot?

Maybe something like this instead?

	if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disable()))) {
		printk(KERN_WARNING "Resume continuing, but firmware for %s not loaded", device);
		return -EBUSY;
	}

(or whatever that %s actually needs to work)

All the same, it still looks better than what we're doing now.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-02 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-02 22:44 [RFC][PATCH] PM: Print a warning if firmware is requested when tasks are frozen Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-02 23:12 ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:21   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-02 23:28     ` Greg KH
2011-05-03  0:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-03 14:05         ` Greg KH
2011-05-02 23:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2011-05-03 11:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 14:06     ` Greg KH
2011-05-03 17:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-03 15:47     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-03 15:56       ` Joe Perches
2011-05-03 17:14         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]       ` <201105031914.18160.rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-05-03 18:03         ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50363.1304379012@localhost \
    --to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox