From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: fix oops after fork failure
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:06:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503984AB.6030802@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120824150804.8e3c4b7e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/24/2012 06:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:36:08 +0400
> Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
>
>> When we want to duplicate a new process, dup_task_struct() will undergo
>> a series of allocations. If alloc_thread_info_node() fails, we call
>> free_task_struct() and return.
>>
>> This seems right, but it is not. free_task_struct() will not only free
>> the task struct from the kmem_cache, but will also call
>> arch_release_task_struct(). The problem is that this function is
>> supposed to undo whatever arch-specific work done by
>> arch_dup_task_struct(), that is not yet called at this point. The
>> particular problem I ran accross was that in x86, we will arrive at
>> fpu_free() without having ever allocated it.
>
> I think ths was already fixed by f19b9f74b7ea3b ("fork: fix error
> handling in dup_task()"). As you would have noticed if you were
> preparing patches against up-to-date kernel versions!
>
I am basing all my patches against mmotm (actually, Michal's git copy of
it...)
I might have missed one spin, though. It happens
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-26 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-23 15:36 [PATCH v2] fork: fix oops after fork failure Glauber Costa
2012-08-23 16:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-08-24 22:08 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-26 2:06 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503984AB.6030802@parallels.com \
--to=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox