From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753212Ab2H3Xjv (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:39:51 -0400 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:45869 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753062Ab2H3Xju (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:39:50 -0400 Message-ID: <503FF9E9.4020701@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:40:25 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux armv7l; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Brown CC: Arnd Bergmann , Russell King , Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Ralf Baechle , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Guan Xuetao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default References: <1346186104-4083-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <503E8E6E.1010101@wwwdotorg.org> <20120830171918.GE4356@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20120830171918.GE4356@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 08/30/12 10:19, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 02:49:34PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 08/28/12 13:35, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> @@ -674,6 +676,7 @@ config ARCH_TEGRA >>> select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS >>> select GENERIC_GPIO >>> select HAVE_CLK >>> + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK > >> For 3.7, Tegra will switch to the common clock framework. I think >> this patch would then disable that. How should we resolve this - >> rebase the Tegra common-clk tree on top of any branch containing >> this patch in order to remove that select statement? > > I'd expect this to be applied on a separate branch so you should be able > to rebase your conversion on top of it or merge it into your branch > which should deal with things well enough I think? That should work.