From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: dongsu.park@profitbricks.com
Cc: dillowda@ornl.gov, roland@kernel.org, sean.hefty@intel.com,
hal.rosenstock@gmail.com, JBottomley@parallels.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix bugs in ib_srp patches for H.A. purposes
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:09:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5041C2D5.1040503@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346443241-24844-1-git-send-email-dongsu.park@profitbricks.com>
On 08/31/12 20:00, dongsu.park@profitbricks.com wrote:
> This patchset aims at fixing bugs that have been discovered in our own
> SRP test environment so far. These patches are based on your patchset v4,
> "Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes",(09 Aug 2012).
>
> The 5th patch, "fix an error accessing invalid memory in
> rport_dev_loss_timedout" is including your suggestion (30 Aug 2012).
>
> You can also pull the following git repo to get the patches.
>
> git://github.com/advance38/linux.git srp-ha
>
> Our test setup consists of two systems.
> Kernel 3.2.15 with SCST v4193 on the target,
> and Kernel 3.2.8 with ib_srp-ha on the initiator.
> Although I rebased the patches again onto 3.6-rc3,
> I suppose there will be no significant differences.
>
> All of the known critical issues seem to have been resolved
> according to our internal tests in the last weeks.
Thanks for the testing and the feedback. Let's hope that the ib_srp
maintainer will be able to review these patches soon. For the linux-scsi
and LKML readers: I've sent my feedback about this patch series to the
linux-rdma mailing list only.
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-01 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-31 20:00 [PATCH 0/5] Fix bugs in ib_srp patches for H.A. purposes dongsu.park
2012-08-31 20:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] ib_srp: free memory correctly in srp_free_iu() dongsu.park
2012-08-31 20:00 ` [PATCH 2/5] ib_srp: removed superfluous warning in send timeout case dongsu.park
2012-08-31 20:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] ib_srp: hold a mutex when adding a new target port dongsu.park
2012-08-31 20:00 ` [PATCH 4/5] ib_srp: check if rport->lld_data is NULL before removing rport dongsu.park
2012-08-31 20:00 ` [PATCH 5/5] ib_srp: fix an error accessing invalid memory in rport_dev_loss_timedout dongsu.park
2012-09-01 8:09 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5041C2D5.1040503@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=dillowda@ornl.gov \
--cc=dongsu.park@profitbricks.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox