From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
ccross@android.com, olof@lixom.net, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: move phy driver from mach-tegra to drivers/usb
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:48:31 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5046772F.6060908@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346395526-18219-1-git-send-email-vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
On 08/31/2012 12:45 AM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
> As part of this patch:
> 1. Moved existing tegra phy driver to drivers/USB directory.
> 2. Added standard USB phy driver APIs to tegra phy driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Felipe, Would it be possible to apply this patch to a topic branch, so
that I can merge it into the Tegra tree? The reason is that I'd like to
remove Tegra's devices.[ch] in kernel 3.7, but to do that, I need to
move a tiny chunk of code out of that file somewhere else, and doing
that relies on adding a #include to usb_phy.h/tegra_usb_phy.h, which is
renamed in this patch.
Alternatively, if you don't think it'll cause any merge conflicts with
the USB PHY tree, I can just take this patch through the Tegra tree if
you want. Venu, do you plan any other patches within the next couple
weeks or so (i.e. before 3.6-rc6) that will depend on this patch? If so,
taking it only through the Tegra tree might not work so well.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-04 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-31 6:45 [PATCH v2] usb: move phy driver from mach-tegra to drivers/usb Venu Byravarasu
2012-09-04 21:48 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-09-05 12:54 ` Venu Byravarasu
2012-09-05 12:52 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-05 13:35 ` Venu Byravarasu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5046772F.6060908@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=vbyravarasu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox