From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, bp@amd64.org
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
ananth@in.ibm.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
gregkh@suse.de, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE flags into a structure
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:18:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5048473F.9070704@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+8MBb+T6H1jK624qkPPmK8BJ0T1-FcRM+9JPKubq65wKvfueA@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/06/2012 12:26 AM, Tony Luck wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Naveen N. Rao
> <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Many MCE flags are boolean in nature, but are declared as integers
>> currently. We can pack these into a bitfield to save some space.
>
> Before this patch:
> size arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 18946 4930 776 24652 604c arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o
>
> After:
> size arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 19335 4890 776 25001 61a9 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o
>
> So we do indeed see "data" reduced by 40 bytes. But
> "text" is up by 389. This seems to be because you have
> another change, not described in the commit log, buried
> in part 2 to add get_dont_log_ce(), set_dont_log_ce() etc.
>
> Compiler version: gcc version 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4) (GCC)
>
> I know I'm contradicting the feedback you got from Borislav here, but
> is this code churn really worth it to save 40 bytes? I don't think so.
Hmm.. I think I agree. I don't see a good way to get rid of the
individual getters and setters without adding some more code churn. I
guess using boolean would be better. Boris?
Thanks,
Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-06 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 10:21 [PATCH 0/3] x86:mce: Some cleanups and bios-set CMCI thresholds Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-05 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/mce: Make sysfs tunables available globally across all cpus Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-05 10:32 ` [PATCH] [mcelog] Start using the new sysfs tunables location Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-05 18:47 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-05 19:09 ` Tony Luck
2012-09-06 6:40 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-06 12:28 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-06 12:34 ` Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-06 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-06 13:21 ` Andi Kleen
2012-09-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce: Pack boolean MCE flags into a structure Naveen N. Rao
2012-09-05 17:15 ` Joe Perches
2012-09-05 18:56 ` Tony Luck
2012-09-06 6:48 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2012-09-06 12:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-05 10:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/mce: Honour bios-set CMCI threshold Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5048473F.9070704@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox