linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Improving directed yield scalability for PLE handler
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:31:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504E4E34.1040603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347308360.2124.59.camel@twins>

On 09/10/2012 04:19 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:12 -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote:
>> +       /*
>> +        * if the target task is not running, then only yield if the
>> +        * current task is in guest mode
>> +        */
>> +       if (!(p_rq->curr->flags & PF_VCPU))
>> +               goto out_irq;
>
> This would make yield_to() only ever work on KVM, not that I mind this
> too much, its a horrid thing and making it less useful for (ab)use is a
> good thing, still this probably wants mention somewhere :-)

Also, it would not preempt a non-kvm task, even if we need
to do that to boost a VCPU. I think the lines above should
be dropped.

-- 
All rights reversed

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-18 13:37 [PATCH RFC V5 0/3] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler Raghavendra K T
2012-07-18 13:37 ` [PATCH RFC V5 1/3] kvm/config: Add config to support ple or cpu relax optimzation Raghavendra K T
2012-07-18 13:37 ` [PATCH RFC V5 2/3] kvm: Note down when cpu relax intercepted or pause loop exited Raghavendra K T
2012-07-18 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC V5 3/3] kvm: Choose better candidate for directed yield Raghavendra K T
2012-07-18 14:39   ` Raghavendra K T
2012-07-19  9:47     ` [RESEND PATCH " Raghavendra K T
2012-07-20 17:36 ` [PATCH RFC V5 0/3] kvm: Improving directed yield in PLE handler Marcelo Tosatti
2012-07-22 12:34   ` Raghavendra K T
2012-07-22 12:43     ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-23  7:35       ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-07-22 17:58     ` Rik van Riel
2012-07-23 10:03 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-07 13:11   ` [RFC][PATCH] Improving directed yield scalability for " Andrew Theurer
2012-09-07 18:06     ` Raghavendra K T
2012-09-07 19:42       ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-08  8:43         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-10 13:16           ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-10 16:03             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 16:56               ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-10 17:12                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 19:10                   ` Raghavendra K T
2012-09-10 20:12                   ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-10 20:19                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-09-10 20:31                       ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2012-09-11  6:08                     ` Raghavendra K T
2012-09-11 12:48                       ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-11 18:27                       ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-13 11:48                         ` Raghavendra K T
2012-09-13 21:30                           ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-14 17:10                             ` Andrew Jones
2012-09-15 16:08                               ` Raghavendra K T
2012-09-17 13:48                                 ` Andrew Jones
2012-09-14 20:34                             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-17  8:02                               ` Andrew Jones
2012-09-16  8:55                             ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-17  8:10                               ` Andrew Jones
2012-09-18  3:03                               ` Andrew Theurer
2012-09-19 13:39                                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-13 12:13                         ` Avi Kivity
2012-09-11  7:04                   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-09-10 14:43         ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504E4E34.1040603@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).